A comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials
| Autor: | Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Emanuel Donchin, Ewout H. Meijer, Bruno Verschuere |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Clinical Psychological Science, RS: FPN CPS IV, Klinische Psychologie (Psychologie, FMG) |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Cognitive science
GUILTY KNOWLEDGE TEST Event (computing) Computer science business.industry Cognitive Neuroscience 05 social sciences Social Sciences Brief Communication Concealed information test (CIT) Guilty knowledge test (GKT) 050105 experimental psychology Brain fingerprinting 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine INTERROGATIVE POLYGRAPHY 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Artificial intelligence VALIDITY P300 business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
| Zdroj: | Cognitive Neurodynamics Cognitive Neurodynamics, 7(2), 155-158. Springer COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS Cognitive Neurodynamics, 7(2), 155-158. Springer Netherlands |
| ISSN: | 1871-4080 |
| Popis: | In a recent issue of Cognitive Neurodynamics Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) published a comprehensive tutorial review of the use of Event Related Brain Potentials (ERP) in the detection of concealed information. Farwell’s review covered much of his own work employing his ‘‘brain fingerprinting’’ technology. All his work showed a 100 % accuracy rate in detecting concealed information. We argue in this comment that Farwell (Cogn Neurodyn 6:115-154, 2012) is misleading and misrepresents the scientific status of brain fingerprinting technology. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink