Repeal of state laws permitting denial of health claims resulting from alcohol impairment: Impact on treatment utilization
| Autor: | Lingpeng Shan, Sunday Azagba, Mark A. Hall, Frank J. Chaloupka, Mark Wolfson |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Health professionals
business.industry Health Policy media_common.quotation_subject Medicine (miscellaneous) Alcohol use disorder Repeal medicine.disease United States Article Hospitalization Alcoholism Denial Treatment utilization Health claims on food labels Alcohol impairment Law medicine Health insurance Humans business media_common |
| Zdroj: | Int J Drug Policy |
| ISSN: | 1873-4758 |
| Popis: | Background Many states in the U.S. still have Alcohol Exclusion Laws (AELs), which allow insurance companies to deny health claims resulting from alcohol impairment. There are concerns that this form of structural stigmatization affects alcohol treatment-seeking behaviors. We examined the effects of AEL repeal on treatment admissions for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Methods Data on alcohol treatment admissions from 1992 to 2017 were obtained from the Treatment Episode Data Set. The state-level aggregate number of treatment admissions was derived, including healthcare professional referrals only, self-referrals only, and both self-referral and healthcare professional referrals. The number of treatment admissions by health insurance status (private, public, and uninsured) was also calculated. The study used a difference-in-differences (DID) quasi-experimental design. Results The DID analysis showed that the number of admissions for alcohol treatment from healthcare professional referrals increased 16% in the AEL repeal states compared to states with AELs or that never had AELs (IRR=1.16, 95% CI=1.07, 1.25). These results were consistent for analysis by payment sources. In particular, treatment admissions from healthcare professional referrals for patients covered by private insurance increased about 38% in states with AEL repeal (IRR=1.38, 95% CI=1.17, 1.64) compared to states without AEL repeal. However, the findings were no longer significant when the state-specific time trends were taken into account. Conclusions This study documented that AEL repeal may have had a significant impact on the number of treatment admissions for AUD. These findings suggest that AELs function as a barrier to treatment-seeking behavior. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect