What Are the Sonographic Outcomes of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture? Nonoperative Versus Surgical Repair?
| Autor: | Rémi Philippot, Frédéric Farizon, Thomas Neri, Aubin Arcade, Sylvain Grange, Marc Braccagni, Bertrand Boyer, Antonio Klasan |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Surgical repair
Rupture medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Significant difference Ultrasound General Medicine Tendon structure Achilles Tendon Tendon Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Treatment Outcome Tendon Injuries medicine Humans Prospective Studies Achilles tendon rupture medicine.symptom business Ultrasonography |
| Zdroj: | Surgical technology international. 39 |
| ISSN: | 1090-3941 |
| Popis: | Introduction: The objective was to compare the two-year ultrasonographic outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATr), either treated surgically or nonoperatively. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, single-center, consecutive series. All patients presenting with acute ATr were included and divided into two groups: surgical or nonoperative groups. At two years, patients were evaluated clinically and sonographically. The parameters studied were length of the tendon on the rupture side (LTCR) and on the contralateral side (LTCS), ratio LTCR/LTCS, maximum anteroposterior diameter on the rupture side (DAPMR), maximum surface area on the rupture side (SMR), maximum anteroposterior diameter on the contralateral side (DAPMS), and maximum surface area on the contralateral side (SMS). Morphological changes in tendon structure were reported. Results: Thirty patients were included. No difference in functional score was observed between both groups. In the nonoperative group, there is a significant difference between: LTCR and LTCS; DAPMR and DAPMS. In the surgical group, there is a significant difference between: LTCR and LTCS; DAPMR and DAPMS; SMR and SMS. There is a significant difference when comparing SMR/SMS between both groups. In terms of morphological changes in tendon structure, there were differences. Conclusion: At two years, there was no difference in functional outcomes between the two groups. In both groups, AT were lengthened and thickened without differences between groups. There was a significant difference when comparing the ratio SMR/SMS between groups. Ultrasound examination demonstrated different morphological changes in tendon structure depending on the treatment performed. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|