ARE ASIAN MIGRANTS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST IN THE LABOR MARKET? A CASE STUDY OF AUSTRALIA

Autor: Satya Paul, Pramod N. Junankar, Wahida Yasmeen
Rok vydání: 2010
Předmět:
Zdroj: The Singapore Economic Review. 55:619-646
ISSN: 1793-6837
0217-5908
DOI: 10.1142/s021759081000395x
Popis: Most of the previous labor migration studies in Australia have focussed on the labor market performance of overseas born relative to Australian born individuals (See, for example, Miller, 1982; Inglis and Stromback, 1984; Wooden et al, 1984; Chapman and Miller, 1985; Wooden and Robertson, 1989; Foster et al, 1991; Beggs and Chapman, 1990; Chapman and Salvage, 1994; Cobb-Clark and Chapman, 1999; Le and Miller, 2000). All invariably show that employment rates among immigrants are higher than among Australian born individuals, and are highest among migrants from a non-English speaking background (NESB). In an important paper exploring the success of migrants who have entered under different visa categories, Cobb-Clark (2000) estimates the probability of participating in the labor market and the probability of employment (conditional on participation). She uses data from Wave 1 (six months after arrival in September 1993) and Wave 2 (eighteen months after arrival) of the Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Australia (LSIA) for her study. Her analysis shows that the selection criteria embodied in different visa categories plays only a limited role in influencing labor market participation. However, employment is more closely related to visa categories. After six months of arrival, migrants in visa categories such as Preferential Family, Concessional Family, Independent and Humanitarian are significantly less likely to be employed than migrants in the Business Skill/ Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS).
Databáze: OpenAIRE