Emotion regulation ability compensates for the depression-related negativity bias
Autor: | Carsten Konrad, Marie Vandekerckhove, Markus Rainer Quirin, Elise L. Radtke, Rainer Düsing, Julius Kuhl |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | Rectorate, Radiology, Psychology, Experimental and Applied Psychology |
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Future studies
Emotions Social Sciences GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Major depressive disorder ATTENTIONAL BIAS CLINICAL DEPRESSION ACTION ORIENTATION Depressive symptomatology Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Orientation (mental) IMPAIRED DISENGAGEMENT Negativity bias ACHIEVEMENT-MOTIVATION Developmental and Educational Psychology medicine Psychology Humans Depression (differential diagnoses) Depressive Disorder Major VOLITIONAL FACILITATION EXECUTIVE FUNCTION Depression Emotion regulation Beck Depression Inventory COGNITIVE-CONTROL General Medicine CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBILITY medicine.disease BF1-990 Emotional Regulation ddc Stroop Test Stroop Clinical psychology Stroop effect |
Zdroj: | Acta Psychologica, Vol 220, Iss, Pp 103414-(2021) ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA |
ISSN: | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
Popis: | Emotion regulation ability (ERA) enables individuals to disengage from negative stimuli. In this study, we investigated the role of ERA in the depression-related negativity bias. Seventy-four individuals with major depressive disorder and eighty-three nonclinical individuals were screened for depressiveness using the Beck Depression Inventory. ERA was assessed using the Action Orientation After Failure Subscale of the Action Control Scale. We used a classical Stroop task variant, wherein the color words were preceded by either a self-relevant positive (success-related), negative (failure-related), or neutral word prime. The expected depressiveness × emotional prime interaction did not reach significance but the expected ERA × emotional prime interaction did. The latter effect was qualified by a three-way interaction between ERA, depressiveness, and emotional prime. Specifically, ERA predicted the negativity bias in individuals with high depressiveness scores. Using the Johnson–Neyman technique, we found that this effect was significant at the level of mild to moderate depression and beyond. Thus, poor ERA in individuals with depression may cause the depression-related negativity bias, whereas (at least) moderate ERA may protect individuals with depression from this bias. Future studies should assess ERA in individuals with depressive symptomatology and investigate how it influences their everyday functioning and treatment outcomes. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |