Percutaneous versus Open Repair of the Ruptured Achilles Tendon

Autor: Andrej Cretnik, Vladimir Smrkolj, Miloš Kosanović
Rok vydání: 2005
Předmět:
Zdroj: The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 33:1369-1379
ISSN: 1552-3365
0363-5465
DOI: 10.1177/0363546504271501
Popis: BackgroundControversy regarding the optimal treatment of the fresh total Achilles tendon rupture remains.PurposeTo compare the results of percutaneous and open Achilles tendon repair.Study DesignCohort study; Level of evidence, 2.MethodsThe results of 132 consecutive patients with acute complete Achilles tendon rupture who were operated on exclusively with modified percutaneous repair under local anesthesia from 1991 to 1997 and followed up for at least 2 years were compared to the results of 105 consecutive patients who were operated on exclusively with open repair under general or spinal anesthesia in the same period.ResultsThere were significantly fewer major complications in the group of percutaneous repairs in comparison with the group of open repairs (4.5% vs 12.4%; P = .03), particularly necrosis (0% vs 5.6%; P = .019), and a lower total number of complications (9.7% vs 21%; P = .013). There were slightly more reruptures (3.7% vs 2.8%; P = .680) and sural nerve disturbances (4.5% vs 2.8%; P = .487) in the group of percutaneous repairs, with no statistically significant difference. Functional assessment using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale and the Holz score showed no statistically significant difference.ConclusionThe results of the study support the choice of (modified) percutaneous suturing under local anesthesia as the method that brings comparable functional results to open repair, with a significantly lower rate of complications.
Databáze: OpenAIRE