Weed surveys and weed mapping in Europe: state of the art and future tasks
| Autor: | Silvia Panozzo, Robert Novák, Garifalia Economou-Antonaka, Hansjörg Krähmer, Dionissios Kalivas, Ineta Vanaga, Guillaume Fried, Maurizio Sattin, Gyula Pinke, J. Holec, Michaela Kolářová, Edita Štefanić, Jukka Salonen, Christian Andreasen |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
business.industry Environmental resource management Biodiversity Arable weedsBiodiversityInvasive weedsSpecies distributionMapping methodologyHerbicide resistant weeds Biology 01 natural sciences Term (time) 010602 entomology Identification (information) Documentation Ranking Precision agriculture Weed Scale (map) business Agronomy and Crop Science 010606 plant biology & botany |
| Zdroj: | Crop protection (2020). doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105010 info:cnr-pdr/source/autori:Krähmer H., Andreasen C., Economou-Antonaka G., Holec J., Kalivas D., Kolárová M., Novak R., Panozzo S., Pinke G., Salonen J., Sattin M., Stefanic E., Vanaga I., Fried G/titolo:Weed surveys and weed mapping in Europe: state of the art and future tasks/doi:10.1016%2Fj.cropro.2019.105010/rivista:Crop protection/anno:2020/pagina_da:/pagina_a:/intervallo_pagine:/volume |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105010 |
| Popis: | Long-term national European weed surveys, large scale classical phytosociological programs and camera-based documentation systems lead to results which can be documented in form of maps. Comparisons of these visual representations of relative weed positions can be used for the prediction of changing weed spectra and of plant biodiversity changes. Statistical methods connected with mapping software are used for the analysis of environmental factors and of farm managing practices influencing the occurrence of weeds. Maps produced by sensor-driven weed detection devices still differ considerably from maps produced via classical phytosociological approaches. Computer algorithms may allow the precise identification of some weeds in camera images. The present technical solutions are, however, still far from those achieved by experienced botanists. Many weed detection tools based on algorithms are not able to distinguish between closely related weeds yet. A few European countries have a long tradition of surveying weeds in major crops by traditional tools. Various software packages are employed for the analysis, documentation and visualisation of survey results. Large scale comprehensive maps including the infestation of crops over different countries are, however, often biased as not every national research group uses the same methods for the assessment of weed infestation. The ranking of the most common species seems, however, to allow comparable conclusions. The recognition of trends in spectrum changes can only be derived from long term studies as we see it. Our review reflects discussions within the Weed Mapping Working Group of the European Weed Research Society over the last ten years. We try to identify new research trends and to respond accordingly with new research projects. What we see today is a shift from traditional mapping approaches towards the use of digital devices as for example in precision farming projects. Another issue of increasing importance is the mapping of herbicide resistant biotypes. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|