Inter- and intraobserver consistency in assessing eligibility for bevacizumab (BVZ) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with centrally located tumors
| Autor: | Radj Gervais, Anderson Loundou, David Planchard, Eric Dansin, J.Y. Gaubert, Gilbert Ferretti, F. Brenac, Arnaud Scherpereel, Fabrice Barlesi, F. Bonodeau, Corinne Balleyguier, C. Lacombe, Denis Moro-Sibilot, O. Corneloup, Benjamin Besse, Yves Menu |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Multivariate analysis
Lung Neoplasms Bevacizumab non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Angiogenesis Inhibitors Antibodies Monoclonal Humanized Carcinoma Non-Small-Cell Lung Medicine Humans Lung cancer Observer Variation business.industry Cancer Antibodies Monoclonal Hematology Odds ratio medicine.disease Confidence interval Oncology Multivariate Analysis business Nuclear medicine Tomography X-Ray Computed Kappa medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 21(8) |
| ISSN: | 1569-8041 |
| Popis: | Background: Bevacizumab (BVZ) combined with platinum-based therapy is registered for first-line treatment of nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with centrally located tumors are stated ineligible for BVZ treatment. The goal of this study was to assess the consistency in evaluating eligibility of patients with central tumors for BVZ treatment. Materials and methods: The study group was composed of 150 NSCLC patients with centrally located tumors. Eligibility for BVZ was assessed by chest computed tomography (CT) scan. Eligibility was assessed independently using CT images reviewed on workstations. Inter- and intraobserver variations on 50 randomly extracted patients were estimated through a statistical modeling (multiple correspondence analysis). Results: Discordance in eligibility was found for 82 patients (55%). The interobserver strength of agreement was fair to moderate (average kappa = 0.40). Contrarily, the intraobserver strength of agreement was good to very good (average kappa = 0.74). At multivariate analysis, the risk of discrepancy was essentially related to the assessment of the contact between the tumor and the vessels (odds ratio = 13.3, 95% confidence interval 2.8–62.6, P = 0.001). Conclusions: The consistency in evaluating eligibility of patients with central tumors for BVZ treatment is weak. The study group indicated more stringent criteria to help physicians in taking the best treatment choice that need however to be prospectively validated. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|