Does Lymphovascular Invasion Predict Regional Nodal Failure in Breast Cancer Patients With Zero to Three Positive Lymph Nodes Treated With Conserving Surgery and Radiotherapy? Implications for Regional Radiation
Autor: | Alphonse G. Taghian, Rimoun Boutrus, Rita F. Abi-Raad, Alexandra Kelada, Elena F. Brachtel, Andrzej Niemierko, Levi Rizk |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2010 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Cancer Research medicine.medical_specialty Lymphovascular invasion Breast surgery medicine.medical_treatment Population Breast Neoplasms Breast cancer medicine Humans Neoplasm Invasiveness Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging education Lymph node Aged Retrospective Studies Aged 80 and over Analysis of Variance education.field_of_study Lymphatic Irradiation Radiation business.industry Carcinoma Ductal Breast Cancer Middle Aged medicine.disease Tumor Burden Surgery Radiation therapy Carcinoma Lobular medicine.anatomical_structure Oncology Lymphatic Metastasis Lymph Node Excision Female Lymph Nodes Breast disease business Follow-Up Studies |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 78:793-798 |
ISSN: | 0360-3016 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.049 |
Popis: | Purpose To examine the relationship between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and regional nodal failure (RNF) in breast cancer patients with zero to three positive nodes treated with breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Methods and Materials The records of 1,257 breast cancer patients with zero to three positive lymph nodes were reviewed. All patients were treated with BCT at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1980 to December 2003. Lymphovascular invasion was diagnosed by hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections and in some cases supported by immunohistochemical stains. Regional nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the ipsilateral supraclavicular, axillary, or internal mammary lymph nodes. Regional nodal failure was diagnosed by clinical and/or radiologic examination. Results The median follow-up was 8 years (range, 0.1–21 years). Lymphovascular invasion was present in 211 patients (17%). In univariate analysis, patients with LVI had a higher rate of RNF (3.32% vs. 1.15%; p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, only tumor size, grade, and local failure were significant predictors of RNF ( p = 0.049, 0.013, and 0.0001, respectively), whereas LVI did not show a significant relationship with RNF (hazard ratio=2.07; 95% CI, 0.8–5.5; p = 0.143). The presence of LVI in the T2/3 population did not increase the risk of RNF over that for those with no LVI ( p = 0.15). In addition, patients with Grade 3 tumors and positive LVI did not have a higher risk of RNF than those without LVI ( p = 0.96). Conclusion These results suggest that LVI can not be used as a sole indicator for regional nodal irradiation in breast cancer patients with zero to three positive lymph nodes treated with BCT. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |