A Study of the Implications of the European Securitisation Regulation 2017/2402 on Malta
| Autor: | Sharon Seychell, Simon Grima, Mark Lawrence Zammit, Ramona Rupeika-Apoga, Joseph Micallef |
|---|---|
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
media_common.quotation_subject
Legislation Accounting Basel Securitisation Framework Financial institutions -- Security measures Documentation 0502 economics and business Financial services industry -- Law and legislation -- Malta Capital requirement Financial services industry -- Security measures Security (Law) -- Malta 050207 economics Capital Requirement Regulation (CRR) media_common Financial institutions -- Law and legislation -- Malta 050208 finance Jurisdiction business.industry Study methodology Capital Markets Union (CMU) 05 social sciences lcsh:Law Banking law -- Malta Surprise Simple Transparent and Standard Securitisation (STS Securitisation) net economic interest Banks and banking -- Malta Bankruptcy Financial crisis business lcsh:K |
| Zdroj: | Laws Volume 9 Issue 3 Laws, Vol 9, Iss 20, p 20 (2020) |
| ISSN: | 2075-471X |
| DOI: | 10.3390/laws9030020 |
| Popis: | A decade ago, the financial world was taken by surprise, when prominent credit institutions filed for bankruptcy. The financial crisis phenomena spurred the need for regulating Securitisation and enhancing the capital requirements framework. In response, the Basel Committee initiated the regulatory treatment for the Simple Transparent and Comparable Securitisation (STC Securitisation), the USA passed the Dodd–Frank Act and the EU introduced Securitisation Regulation No. 2017/2402 to address the causes and failures, which were identified, following the aftermath of this financial crisis. With this article, we aim to analyse the main provisions of the Regulation No. 2017/2402 on Malta as a jurisdiction for securitisation and provide an insight on the prospective market development. To reach our aim we analysed scholarly documentation (academic chapters, journals, articles and monographs), rules, guidelines, recommendations, directives and regulations and use the case study methodology, as suggested by Yin (2003) and Yazan (2015), on Malta. In our opinion, recently, Malta has made significant improvements in the securitisation sector, mostly evidenced by the introduction of the legislation. All interviewees emphasised that Malta has substantial opportunities for further growth in the securitisation market and it is encouraged to be exploited well. peer-reviewed |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|