Interrater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale

Autor: Kristoffer Lygren Walther, Marianne Arnesen, Karoline H. Koritzinsky, Tore Buer Christensen, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein, Andrew E. Skodol, Ingeborg Helene Eikenæs, Sara Germans Selvik, Svenn Torgersen, Tor Erik Nysæter, Geir Pedersen, Benjamin Hummelen, Muirne C. S. Paap, Donna S. Bender
Přispěvatelé: Developmental and behavioural disorders in education and care: assessment and intervention
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
EMPIRICAL SUPPORT
050103 clinical psychology
Psychometrics
Intraclass correlation
Health
Toxicology and Mutagenesis

media_common.quotation_subject
personality disorder
UNITED-STATES
Personality Disorders
IRONIC FATE
SELF-REPORT
CLASSIFICATION
DSM-5
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Interview
Psychological

medicine
Personality
Humans
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION
media_common
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
FIELD TRIALS
Norway
05 social sciences
Personality pathology
Reproducibility of Results
medicine.disease
Personality disorders
030227 psychiatry
PREVALENCE
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
PART I
Clinical Psychology
Inter-rater reliability
SEVERITY
Structured interview
Psychology
Clinical psychology
Zdroj: Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(6), 630-641
ISSN: 0022-3891
Popis: The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) presents an alternative model for personality disorders in which severity of personality pathology is evaluated by the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). The Structured Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, Module I (SCID-5-AMPD I) is a new tool for LPFS assessment, but its interrater reliability (IRR) has not yet been tested. Here we examined the reliability of the Norwegian translation of the SCID-5-AMPD I, applying two different designs: IRR assessment based on ratings of 17 video-recorded SCID-5-AMPD I interviews by five raters; and test-retest IRR based on interviews of 33 patients administered by two different raters within a short interval. For the video-based investigation, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranged from .77 to .94 for subdomains, .89 to .95 for domains, and .96 for total LPFS. For the test-retest investigation, ICC ranged from .24 to .72 for subdomains, .59 to .90 for domains, and .75 for total LPFS. The test-retest study revealed questionable reliability estimates for some subdomains. However, overall the level of personality functioning was measured with a sufficient degree of IRR when assessed by the SCID-5-AMPD I.
Databáze: OpenAIRE