Evaluation of the key geriatric assessment constructs in primary brain tumor population - a descriptive study

Autor: Dilorom Sass, Elizabeth Vera, Anna Choi, Alvina Acquaye, Nicole Briceno, Alexa Christ, Ewa Grajkowska, Varna Jammula, Jason Levine, Matthew Lindsley, Jennifer Reyes, Kayla Roche, James L. Rogers, Michael Timmer, Lisa Boris, Eric Burton, Nicole Lollo, Marissa Panzer, Marta Penas-Prado, Valentina Pillai, Lily Polskin, Brett J. Theeler, Jing Wu, Mark R. Gilbert, Terri S. Armstrong, Heather Leeper
Rok vydání: 2022
Předmět:
Zdroj: J Geriatr Oncol
ISSN: 1879-4068
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.013
Popis: INTRODUCTION: Despite an increasing aging population, older adults (≥ 65 years) with primary brain tumors (PBTs) are not routinely assessed for geriatric vulnerabilities. Recent reports of geriatric assessment (GA) in patients with glioblastomas demonstrated that GA may serve as a sensitive prognosticator of overall survival. Yet, current practice does not include routine evaluation of geriatric vulnerabilities and the relevance of GA has not been previously evaluated in broader cohorts of PBT patients. The objective of this descriptive study was to assess key GA constructs in adults with PBT dichotomized into older versus younger groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 579 participants with PBT recruited between 2016 and 2020, dichotomized into older (≥ 65 years, n = 92) and younger (≤ 64 years, n = 487) from an ongoing observational trial. GA constructs were evaluated using socio-demographic characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), polypharmacy (>5 daily medications), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Neurologic Function Score (NFS), and patient-reported outcome assessments including general health, functional status, symptom burden and interference, and mood. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlations were used to evaluate differences between age groups. RESULTS: Older participants were more likely to have problems with mobility (58% vs. 44%), usual activities (64% vs 50%) and self-care (38% vs 26%) compared to the younger participants (odds ratios [ORs] = 1.3–1.4, ps
Databáze: OpenAIRE