An N-Pact Factor for Clinical Psychological Research
| Autor: | Kathleen Wade Reardon, Kathrin Herzhoff, Avanté J. Smack, Jennifer L. Tackett |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2018 |
| Předmět: |
Male
050103 clinical psychology Biomedical Research Psychological research Psychology Clinical 05 social sciences PsycINFO Statistical power Proxy (climate) Clinical Psychology Psychiatry and Mental health Empirical research Clinical research Research Design Sample size determination Sample Size Abnormal psychology Humans 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Periodicals as Topic Psychology Biological Psychiatry Clinical psychology |
| DOI: | 10.31234/osf.io/4fybk |
| Popis: | Although an emphasis on adequate sample size and statistical power has a long history in clinical psychological science (Cohen, 1992), increased attention to the replicability of scientific findings has again turned attention to the importance of statistical power (Bakker, van Dijk, & Wicherts, 2012). These recent efforts have not yet circled back to modern clinical psychological research, despite the continued importance of sample size and power in producing a credible body of evidence. As one step in this process of scientific self-examination, the present study estimated an N-pact Factor (the statistical power of published empirical studies to detect typical effect sizes; Fraley & Vazire, 2014) in two leading clinical journals (the Journal of Abnormal Psychology; JAP, and the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology; JCCP) for the years 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. Study sample size, as one proxy for statistical power, is a useful focus because it allows direct comparisons with other subfields and may highlight some of the core methodological differences between clinical and other areas (e.g., hard-to-reach populations, greater emphasis on correlational designs). We found that, across all years examined, the average median sample size in clinical research is 179 participants (175 for JAP and 182 for JCCP). The power to detect a small-medium effect size of .20 is just below 80% for both journals. Although the clinical N-pact factor was higher than that estimated for social psychology, the statistical power in clinical journals is still limited to detect many effects of interest to clinical psychologists, with little evidence of improvement in sample sizes over time. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|