Optimizing Training Response for Women in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
| Autor: | Anton Pecha, Patrick D. Savage, Philip A. Ades, Sherrie Khadanga, Jason L Rengo |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Strength training medicine.medical_treatment Myocardial Infarction High-Intensity Interval Training Interval training law.invention Oxygen Consumption Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Randomized controlled trial law Heart rate Medicine Aerobic exercise Humans Women Coronary Artery Bypass Aged Aged 80 and over Heart Failure Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation Rehabilitation Cardiac Rehabilitation business.industry Brief Report VO2 max Resistance Training Middle Aged Continuous training Exercise Therapy Lower Extremity Anesthesia Female Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
| Zdroj: | JAMA Cardiol |
| ISSN: | 2380-6591 |
| Popis: | IMPORTANCE: Despite lower baseline fitness levels, women in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) do not typically improve peak aerobic exercise capacity (defined as peak oxygen uptake [peak Vo(2)]) compared with men in CR. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and intensive lower extremity resistance training (RT) compared with standard moderate intensity continuous training (MCT) on peak Vo(2 )among women in CR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial conducted from July 2017 to February 2020 included women from a community-based cardiac rehabilitation program affiliated with a university hospital in Vermont. A total of 56 women (mean [SD] age, 65 [11] years; range 43-98 years) participating in CR enrolled in the study. INTERVENTIONS: MCT (70% to 85% of peak heart rate [HR]) with moderate intensive RT or HIIT (90% to 95% of peak HR) along with higher-intensity lower extremity RT 3 times per week over 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change in peak Vo(2) (L/min) from baseline to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Peak Vo(2) increased to a greater degree in the HIIT group (+23%) than in the control group (+7%) (mean [SD] increase, 0.3 [0.2] L/min vs 0.1 [0.2] L/min; P = .03). Similarly, the change in leg strength was greater in the HIIT-RT group compared with the control group (mean [SD] increase, 15.3 [0.3] kg vs 6.4 [1.1] kg; P = .004). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: An exercise protocol combining HIIT and intensive lower extremity RT enhanced exercise training response for women in CR compared with standard CR exercise training. Women randomized to HIIT experienced significantly greater improvements in both peak Vo(2) and leg strength during CR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03438968 |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|