Quality of life outcomes after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum utilizing a new set of metallic bars and stabilizers
| Autor: | Niura Noro Hamilton, Miguel Lia Tedde, Paulo Manuel Pêgo-Fernandes, Rafael Lucas Costa de Carvalho, Gustavo Falavigna Guilherme, Jose Ribas Milanese de Campos, Vanessa Moreira Sousa, Flavio Henrique Savazzi, Vitor Floriano Salomao Junior |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty Adolescent Intervention group Nuss procedure 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine Quality of life Pectus excavatum 030225 pediatrics medicine Humans Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Prospective randomized study In patient Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Image domain business.industry Significant difference General Medicine medicine.disease Surgery Treatment Outcome 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Funnel Chest Pediatrics Perinatology and Child Health Quality of Life business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of pediatric surgery. 56(3) |
| ISSN: | 1531-5037 |
| Popis: | The aim of the study was to evaluate the postoperative quality of life (QoL) of patients who underwent minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) with a newly designed bar and bar stabilizers.We conducted a prospective randomized study in which patients were operated either with standard perpendicular stabilizers (control group) or with the newly designed oblique stabilizers (intervention group). All patients were evaluated 6 months after the operation with the Pectus Excavatum Evaluation Questionnaire (PEEQ).There were 16 patients in the control group and 14 in the intervention group. Mean age was 17 (SD: 3.3, range 14-27) years. There were no demographic differences between groups. Two patients in the control group and one in the intervention group were repaired with two bars instead of one. There was one reoperation in each group. There was a significant difference between the pre- and postoperative scores, in both groups, in the patient body image domain (control group: 9.5 to 3; p 0.01; intervention group 10 to 3; p 0.01), as well as in the psychosocial domain (control group: 13.5 to 24, p 0.01; intervention group: 15 to 24, p 0.01). With regards to the patients' perception of physical difficulties before and after MIRPE, the difference between pre- and postoperative scores was greater in the intervention group (8 to 12, p 0.01) than in the control group (10 to 11, p = 0.04). The mean length of stay was 4.5 and 5 days in the intervention group and the control group, respectively.Our study showed that patients who underwent MIRPE with the newly designed bars and stabilizers had non-inferior outcomes than patients reported in the literature who underwent MIRPE with standard bars and stabilizers. We found slightly better outcomes in patients in the intervention group compared to the control group, but larger studies will be needed to confirm if those differences are statistically significant.II. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect