Assessing the Quality of Available Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Intermittent Claudication: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Checklist
| Autor: | C.B. Terwee, J.C. Breek, Mark J.W. Koelemay, S. Jens, A.P. Conijn |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Epidemiology and Data Science, EMGO - Musculoskeletal health |
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Activities of daily living Health Status MEDLINE Prom Walking Physical medicine and rehabilitation Quality of life (healthcare) Cost of Illness Predictive Value of Tests Surveys and Questionnaires Activities of Daily Living Medicine Humans Quality Indicators Health Care Medicine(all) Evidence-Based Medicine Exercise Tolerance business.industry Construct validity Reproducibility of Results Functional status Evidence-based medicine Intermittent Claudication Patient reported outcome measures Checklist female genital diseases and pregnancy complications Systematic review Physical therapy Quality of Life Patient-reported outcome Surgery business Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Measurement properties |
| Zdroj: | European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 49(3), 316-334. W.B. Saunders Ltd Conijn, A P, Jens, S, Terwee, C B, Breek, J C & Koelemay, M J W 2015, ' Assessing the Quality of Available Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Intermittent Claudication: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Checklist ', European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 316-334 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.002 |
| ISSN: | 1078-5884 |
| Popis: | Objective The aim was to critically appraise, compare, and summarize the quality of the measurement properties of all available disease specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) on health related quality of life and functional status validated in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). Methods A systematic search was carried out in Embase and Medline (last search November 18, 2013). The quality of the identified studies was assessed per measurement property according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurements Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Data on the measurement properties were extracted to determine a level of evidence per measurement property per instrument. Results Forty three studies were found evaluating 10 health related quality of life and two functional status PROMs. Evidence for the existence of subscales (structural validity) and for internal consistency (interrelatedness of items within subscales) for PROMs was generally poor. Evidence for construct validity was limited. Accuracy and reproducibility of PROMs were often uncertain, since reliability studies were mostly performed in small patient samples. Responsiveness, or the ability of PROMs to detect change over time, was hardly ever studied. Conclusion The quality of the validation of most disease specific PROMs for IC is alarming, hampering all conclusion based on these PROMs. Considering the results, the PAD quality of life questionnaire (PADQOL), Intermittent claudication questionnaire (ICQ) and the Vascular quality of life questionnaire (VascuQol) might be appropriate PROMs for health related quality of life, while the Walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) and Estimate ambulation capacity by history questionnaire (EACH-Q) appear suitable PROMs for functional status. However, all PROMs require further validation studies to fill the gaps in their measurement properties. The shortcomings highlighted in this review should be taken into account when interpreting PROM results. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect