The role of legal intermediaries in the dispute pyramid:inequalities before the French legal system
| Autor: | Alexis Spire, Aude Lejeune |
|---|---|
| Přispěvatelé: | Université de Lille, CNRS, Centre d'Études et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales (CERAPS) - UMR 8026, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Administratives, Politiques et Sociales - UMR 8026 (CERAPS), Sciences Po Lille - Institut d'études politiques de Lille (IEP Lille)-Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur les enjeux Sociaux - sciences sociales, politique, santé (IRIS), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, ANR-15-CE28-0009,PROFET,Pratiques et représentations ordinaires des gouvernés face à l'Etat(2015), Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Lille, LillOA, Pratiques et représentations ordinaires des gouvernés face à l'Etat - - PROFET2015 - ANR-15-CE28-0009 - AAPG2015 - VALID |
| Jazyk: | angličtina |
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
inequality
[SHS.DROIT] Humanities and Social Sciences/Law Inequality media_common.quotation_subject legal intermediaries Outcome (game theory) Intermediary civil justice [SHS.DROIT]Humanities and Social Sciences/Law Political science Pyramid 050602 political science & public administration Social inequality legal mobilisation occupational group Legal profession 0505 law media_common Law and economics 050502 law Plaintiff 05 social sciences France 16. Peace & justice [SHS.SCIPO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science 0506 political science Identification (information) [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science Law |
| Zdroj: | International Journal of Law in Context International Journal of Law in Context, Cambridge University Press (CUP), In press, ⟨10.1017/s1744552321000513⟩ International Journal of Law in Context, In press, ⟨10.1017/s1744552321000513⟩ |
| ISSN: | 1744-5523 1744-5531 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/s1744552321000513⟩ |
| Popis: | This paper shows that social inequalities are cumulative and occur at each stage of the dispute pyramid, from the identification of a conflict through to satisfaction with its outcome. Based on a large and original survey on ordinary people's representations of and practices within the legal system in France (N = 2,660), our study finds that an individual's contact, or lack of contact, with a legal intermediary, who may be a legal professional or a non-legal professional, has a very significant impact on the decision to take a case to court. Contact with a legal intermediary also influences the individual's satisfaction with the outcome, but not in the same way for all plaintiffs: income is a more determining factor in satisfaction with the outcome in cases where the judge makes a decision than in cases where a solution is found outside the courtroom. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|