Right bundle branch block and male sex may help predict appropriate ICD therapies in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and a prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
| Autor: | M. Jimenez-Blanco Bravo, V. Castro Urda, C. Parra Esteban, J.L. Zamorano Gómez, S. Del Prado Diaz, J Alvarez Garcia, G.L. Alonso Salinas, I. Fernandez Lozano, J. Toquero Ramos, M.C. Amores Luque |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Web of Science |
| ISSN: | 1522-9645 0195-668X |
| DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0930 |
| Popis: | Background Previous studies have shown that prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in patients with symptomatic severe systolic dysfunction reduce all-cause mortality. However, their benefit in patients with severe systolic dysfunction of non-ischemic origin is not so clear, and is currently under debate. Methods/Aim We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM) who underwent prophylactic ICD implantation between 2008 and 2020 in two tertiary centers. Our main goal was to identify predictors of appropriate ICD therapies (ATP and/or shocks) in this cohort of patients. Results A total of 224 patients were included, median age 62.7 years, 73.7% men. During a median follow-up of 51 months, 61 patients (27.2%) required appropriate ICD intervention, 7 patients (3.1%) presented inappropriate shocks and 11 (4.9%) had device infection. Patients that received appropriate ICD therapies, as compared to those who did not, were more frequently men (86.9% vs 68.7%, p=0.006) and were significantly younger (median age 58.7 years, IQR 53.0–64.8 vs 63.7, IQR 57.0–69.8; p=0.02). Left ventricular end diastolic volume (LV-EDV) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LV-ESV) were both significantly higher in this subgroup of patients (median LVEDV 100 ml/m2 vs 86, p=0.0106; median LVESV 72.2 ml/m2 vs 60.9, p=0.0467). A trend towards lower LVEF was also noted, but it did not reach statistical significance (26% vs 29%, p=0.077). Regarding ECG previous to implant, patients that required ICD intervention presented more frequently complete right bundle branch block (RBBB) (14.8% vs 4.3%, p=0.007). On the other hand, left bundle branch block (LBBB) was more frequent in those patients who did not receive ICD intervention during follow-up (47.2% vs 26.2%, p=0.005). Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics and results. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, RBBB (HR 3.9, CI 95% 1.9–8.0, p Conclusion RBBB and male sex may help identify patients with NICM at high-risk of ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD intervention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Baseline characteristics and resultsKaplan-Meier curves |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|