[18F]FDG PET/MRI versus contrast-enhanced MRI in detecting regional HNSCC metastases
Autor: | Cristina Campi, Roberto Di Carlo, Diego Cecchin, Giulia Oliveri, Enzo Emauelli, Roberto Stramare, Piero Nicolai, Laura Albertoni, Daniele Borsetto, Valentina Bodanza, Filippo Crimì, Arcangelo Merola, Carmelo Lacognata, Pietro Zucchetta |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Receiver operating characteristic CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI business.industry General Medicine Gold standard (test) medicine.disease HNSCC Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 18f fdg pet Lymph nodes PET/MRI 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine medicine.anatomical_structure 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis medicine Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging Histopathology Lymph Nuclear medicine business Lymph node |
Zdroj: | Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 35:260-269 |
ISSN: | 1864-6433 0914-7187 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12149-020-01565-5 |
Popis: | To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI using established dimensional and morphological criteria versus integrated [18F]FDG PET/MRI in identifying regional lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). For this purpose, we compare MRI and PET/MRI using the histopathological findings in dissected lymph nodes as the gold standard. We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with histologically proven HNSCC who underwent gadolinium-enhanced [18F]FDG PET/MRI as part of their staging. All neck lymph nodes were classified on MRI using dimensional and/or morphological criteria. Then, they were jointly assessed by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist using integrated [18F]PET/MR images. ROC curves were obtained to compare the techniques. Lymph node histopathology was considered as the reference standard. Out of 865 lymph nodes, 35 were malignant at histopathology (3 with micro-metastases). Sensitivity and specificity were 48.6% and 99.5% for MRI using dimensional criteria; 60.0% and 99.6% for MRI using morphological criteria; 60.0% and 99.4% for MRI using both; and 74.3% and 97.6% for PET using MR as anatomic localization. The area under the ROC curve was higher for PET and MRI localization (0.859) than for MRI using dimensional (0.740; p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |