Cost effectiveness analysis of clinically driven versus routine laboratory monitoring of antiretroviral therapy in Uganda and Zimbabwe

Autor: Medina Lara, Antonieta, Kigozi, Jesse, Amurwon, Jovita, Muchabaiwa, Lazarus, Nyanzi Wakaholi, Barbara, Mujica Mota, Ruben E, Walker, A Sarah, Kasirye, Ronnie, Ssali, Francis, Reid, Andrew, Grosskurth, Heiner, Babiker, Abdel G, Kityo, Cissy, Katabira, Elly, Munderi, Paula, Mugyenyi, Peter, Hakim, James, Darbyshire, Janet, Gibb, Diana M, Gilks, Charles F, DART Trial Team
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2012
Předmět:
Male
Pediatrics
Non-Clinical Medicine
Total cost
Cost-Benefit Analysis
lcsh:Medicine
HIV Infections
Global Health
Cost Effectiveness
0302 clinical medicine
Science Policy and Economics
Economic cost
Health care
Uganda
030212 general & internal medicine
lcsh:Science
health care economics and organizations
Multidisciplinary
Cost–benefit analysis
HIV diagnosis and management
Cost-effectiveness analysis
3. Good health
Cohort
Medicine
Infectious diseases
Female
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Research Article
Marginal cost
Adult
Zimbabwe
medicine.medical_specialty
Anti-HIV Agents
Science Policy
030231 tropical medicine
Retrovirology and HIV immunopathogenesis
Viral diseases
03 medical and health sciences
Health Economics
Toxicity Tests
medicine
Humans
Intensive care medicine
business.industry
lcsh:R
HIV
Quality-adjusted life year
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
lcsh:Q
business
Delivery of Health Care
Zdroj: PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 4, p e33672 (2012)
ISSN: 1932-6203
Popis: BACKGROUND: Despite funding constraints for treatment programmes in Africa, the costs and economic consequences of routine laboratory monitoring for efficacy and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have rarely been evaluated. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in the DART trial (ISRCTN13968779). Adults in Uganda/Zimbabwe starting ART were randomised to clinically-driven monitoring (CDM) or laboratory and clinical monitoring (LCM); individual patient data on healthcare resource utilisation and outcomes were valued with primary economic costs and utilities. Total costs of first/second-line ART, routine 12-weekly CD4 and biochemistry/haematology tests, additional diagnostic investigations, clinic visits, concomitant medications and hospitalisations were considered from the public healthcare sector perspective. A Markov model was used to extrapolate costs and benefits 20 years beyond the trial. RESULTS: 3316 (1660LCM;1656CDM) symptomatic, immunosuppressed ART-naive adults (median (IQR) age 37 (32,42); CD4 86 (31,139) cells/mm(3)) were followed for median 4.9 years. LCM had a mean 0.112 year (41 days) survival benefit at an additional mean cost of $765 [95%CI:685,845], translating into an adjusted incremental cost of $7386 [3277,dominated] per life-year gained and $7793 [4442,39179] per quality-adjusted life year gained. Routine toxicity tests were prominent cost-drivers and had no benefit. With 12-weekly CD4 monitoring from year 2 on ART, low-cost second-line ART, but without toxicity monitoring, CD4 test costs need to fall below $3.78 to become cost-effective (
Databáze: OpenAIRE