A pilot study of clinical agreement in cardiovascular preparticipation examinations: how good is the standard of care?

Autor: Jeremy D Johnson, Dean C. Taylor, Ralph G. Oriscello, Francis G. O'Connor, Mark Chapin
Rok vydání: 2005
Předmět:
Zdroj: Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 15(3)
ISSN: 1050-642X
Popis: Objective To evaluate the interobserver agreement between physicians regarding a abnormal cardiovascular assessment on athletic preparticipation examinations. Design Cross-sectional clinical survey. Setting Outpatient Clinic, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. Participants We randomly selected 101 out of 539 cadet-athletes presenting for a preparticipation examination. Two primary care sports medicine fellows and a cardiologist examined the cadets. Interventions After obtaining informed consent from all participants, all 3 physicians separately evaluated all 101 cadets. The physicians recorded their clinical findings and whether they thought further cardiovascular evaluation (echocardiography) was indicated. Main outcome measures Rate of referral for further cardiovascular evaluation, clinical agreement between sports medicine fellows, and clinical agreement between sports medicine fellows and the cardiologist. Results Each fellow referred 6 of the 101 evaluated cadets (5.9%). The cardiologist referred none. Although each fellow referred 6 cadets, only 1 cadet was referred by both. The kappa statistic for clinical agreement between fellows is 0.114 (95% CI, -0.182 to 0.411). There was no clinical agreement between the fellows and the cardiologist. Conclusions This pilot study reveals a low level of agreement between physicians regarding which athletes with an abnormal examination deserved further testing. It challenges the standard of care and questions whether there is a need for improved technologies or improved training in cardiovascular clinical assessment.
Databáze: OpenAIRE