The evaluation of the consistency of quantified assertions
| Autor: | Philip N. Johnson-Laird, Marco Ragni, Sangeet Khemlani |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2013 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Male Weak consistency Logic Sequential consistency Strong consistency Consistency model Experimental and Cognitive Psychology Causal consistency Consistency (knowledge bases) Models Psychological Thinking Judgment Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) Metric (mathematics) Calculus Humans Psychology Set (psychology) Social psychology |
| Zdroj: | Memory & Cognition. 42:53-66 |
| ISSN: | 1532-5946 0090-502X |
| Popis: | Consistency is a hallmark of rationality, and this article reports three experiments examining how reasoners determine the consistency of quantified assertions about the properties of individuals-for example, All of the actors are waiters. The mental model theory postulates that reasoners determine consistency by trying to construct a model of all of the assertions in a set. As the theory predicts, consistency is easier to establish when many different sorts of individuals satisfy the assertions (Exp. 1), when the predicted initial mental model satisfies them (Exp. 2), and otherwise when the model satisfying them is not too distant from the initial model, according to Levenshtein's metric (Exp. 3). |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink