Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study

Autor: Gaurav Dave, Melissa A. Green, Tiffany L. Young, Jennifer Hankins, Leah Frerichs, Catherine W. Striley, Adina Black, Arleen F. Brown, Crystal W. Cené, Deepthi S. Varma, Stefanie D. Vassar, Greer Sullivan, Linda B. Cottler, Shristi Tiwari, Corrine W. Ruktanonchai, Jennifer Jones, Jessica G. Burke, Ann M. Cheney, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Nakita N Lovelady, Jennifer Schaal, Mimi Kim
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Male
Knowledge management
Strategy and Management
Geography
Planning and Development

Research Outcomes
8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
Pilot Projects
0302 clinical medicine
Credibility
Health care
National Institutes of Health
030212 general & internal medicine
Sociology
Cooperative Behavior
CBPR
Evaluation
Community engagement
Concept map
Communication
Health Services
Public relations
Health equity
Research Personnel
Community-Institutional Relations
Public Health and Health Services
Female
Health Services Research
Translational science
0305 other medical science
Health and social care services research
Community-Based Participatory Research
Concept Mapping
Social Psychology
Universities
Health Personnel
Translational research
Trust
Article
03 medical and health sciences
Community-Academic Partnerships
Clinical Research
Trust Community-Academic Partnerships
Translational Research
Urban and Regional Planning
Humans
Social Sciences Methods
Business and International Management
030505 public health
business.industry
Public Health
Environmental and Occupational Health

United States
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Community Engagement
Community-Engaged Research
Applied Economics
Sustainability
CTSA
Generic health relevance
business
Zdroj: Evaluation and program planning, vol 66, iss C
Popis: Objectives Collaborations between communities, healthcare practices and academic institutions are a strategy to address health disparities. Trust is critical in the development and maintaining of effective collaborations. The aim of this pilot study was to engage stakeholders in defining determinants of trust in community academic research partnerships and to develop a framework for measuring trust. Methods The study was conducted by five collaborating National Institute of Health’ Clinical and Translational Sciences Awardees. We used concept mapping to engage three stakeholders: community members, healthcare providers and academicians. We conducted hierarchical cluster analysis to assess the determinants of trust in community-academic research partnerships. Results A total of 186 participants provided input generating 2,172 items that were consolidated into 125 unique items. A five cluster solution was defined: authentic, effective and transparent communication; mutually respectful and reciprocal relationships; sustainability; committed partnerships; and, communication, credibility and methodology to anticipate and resolve problems. Conclusion Results from this study contribute to an increasing empirical body of work to better understand and improve the underlying factors that contribute to building and sustaining trust in community academic research partnerships.
Databáze: OpenAIRE