Higher clinical pregnancy rate with in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in treatment of non-male factor infertility: Systematic review and meta-analysis
| Autor: | Shaimaa S. Abdelrheem, Amal A.M. Ahmed, Ahmed M. Abbas, Mansour A. Khalifa, Mohamed F. Abd El-Ghany, Ihab I. Samaha, Reda S. Hussein, Karim A. El Etriby, Mohamed A. Elsenity, Mostafa M. Khodry |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Infertility
Adult medicine.medical_specialty Pregnancy Rate medicine.medical_treatment Fertilization in Vitro Intracytoplasmic sperm injection 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Human fertilization Pregnancy medicine Humans Embryo Implantation Sperm Injections Intracytoplasmic reproductive and urinary physiology Gynecology 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine In vitro fertilisation business.industry Obstetrics and Gynecology medicine.disease Confidence interval Treatment Outcome Reproductive Medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Meta-analysis Relative risk Fertilization Female Live birth business Infertility Female Live Birth |
| Zdroj: | Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction. 49(6) |
| ISSN: | 2468-7847 |
| Popis: | Objective To evaluate the evidence about in-vitro fertilization (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for the treatment of non-male factor infertility. Data sources Electronic databases searched using the following MeSH terms (Sperm Injection, Intracytoplasmic) AND (in Vitro Fertilisation) AND (Infertility). Methods of study selection All RCTs included infertile patients due to non-male factors underwent IVF or ICSI were considered for this meta-analysis. One-thousand twenty-two studies were identified of which 20 studies deemed eligible for this review. Data extraction Three independent authors extracted the relevant data from included studies. The study outcomes were pooled in the form of relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) using Mantel-Hansel method. The main outcome measures are the fertilization rate, the implantation rate, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), the total fertilization failure and the live birth rate. Results Regarding the fertilization rate, the pooled estimate did not favour either IVF or ICSI group (RR = 0.94; 95 %CI [0.82, 1.07]; p = 0.34). However, IVF significantly increased the CPR than ICSI (RR = 1.28, 95 %CI [1.11, 1.49]; p = 0.001). The overall effect estimate did not favor either of two groups regarding the implantation rate (RR = 1.25, 95 % CI [0.92, 1.68], p = 0.15). Similarly, no difference between both groups regarding the live birth rate (RR = 1.08, 95 % CI [0.79, 1.49]; p = 0.62). Conclusions No difference between ICSI and IVF regarding fertilization rate per oocytes, implantation rate and live birth rate in the treatment of non-male factor infertility, while IVF has significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate and higher risk of total fertilization failure. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect