Benchmarking of the BITalino biomedical toolkit against an established gold standard
Autor: | Margarida Reis, Diana Batista, Hugo Ferreira, Ana Fred, Carlos Santos Moreira, Hugo Silva |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
electromyography
lcsh:Medical technology Computer science data acquisition electrocardiography electromyography data post-processing methods 0206 medical engineering Feature extraction BioPac MP35 Student Lab Pro device Health Informatics 02 engineering and technology Article 030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging 03 medical and health sciences medical signal detection 0302 clinical medicine Data acquisition Health Information Management Similarity (network science) Segmentation medical signal processing Protocol (science) Signal processing business.industry feature extraction physiological signal acquisition educational research purposes electrodermal activity signals Pattern recognition Benchmarking Gold standard (test) 020601 biomedical engineering signal processing techniques lcsh:R855-855.5 BITalino biomedical toolkit electroencephalography data physiology root mean square error mean square error methods Artificial intelligence methodical experimental protocol business electroencephalography |
Zdroj: | Healthcare Technology Letters Healthcare Technology Letters (2019) |
ISSN: | 2053-3713 |
Popis: | The low-cost multimodal platform BITalino is being increasingly used for educational and research purposes. However, there is still a lack of well-structured work comparing data acquired by this toolkit against a reference device, using established experimental protocols. This work intends to fill the said gap by benchmarking the performance of BITalino against the BioPac MP35 Student Lab Pro device. This work followed a methodical experimental protocol to acquire data from the two devices simultaneously. Four physiological signals were acquired: electrocardiography, electromyography, electrodermal activity and electroencephalography. Root mean square error and coefficient of determination were computed to analyse differences between BITalino and BioPac. Electrodermal activity signals were very similar for the two devices, even without applying any major signal processing techniques. For electrocardiography, a simple morphological comparison also revealed high similarity between devices, and this similarity increased after a common segmentation procedure was followed. Regarding electromyography and electroencephalography data, the approach consisted of comparing features extracted using common post-processing methods. The differences between BITalino and BioPac were again small. Overall, the results presented here show a close similarity between data acquired by the BITalino and by the reference device. This is an important validation step for all researchers working with this multimodal platform. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |