A systematic review of directly applied biologic therapies for acute spinal cord injury
| Autor: | Brian K. Kwon, Wolfram Tetzlaff, Ward T. Plunet, Karim Fouad, Jessica Hillyer, Michael G. Fehlings, Darryl Baptiste, Elena B. Okon, Lynne C. Weaver |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2010 |
| Předmět: |
Pathology
medicine.medical_specialty Atorvastatin Nogo Proteins Reviews Bioinformatics Neuroprotection medicine Animals Humans Spinal cord injury Spinal Cord Injuries business.industry Antibodies Monoclonal Minocycline medicine.disease Riluzole Clinical trial Disease Models Animal Treatment Outcome Erythropoietin Neurology (clinical) business Pioglitazone Myelin Proteins medicine.drug |
| Zdroj: | Journal of neurotrauma. 28(8) |
| ISSN: | 1557-9042 |
| Popis: | An increasing number of therapies for spinal cord injury (SCI) are emerging from the laboratory and seeking translation into human clinical trials. Many of these are administered as soon as possible after injury with the hope of attenuating secondary damage and maximizing the extent of spared neurologic tissue. In this article, we systematically reviewed the available preclinical research on such neuroprotective therapies that are administered in a non-invasive manner for acute SCI. Specifically, we reviewed treatments that have a relatively high potential for translation due to the fact that they are already used in human clinical applications or are available in a form that could be administered to humans. These included: erythropoietin, NSAIDs, anti-CD11d antibodies, minocycline, progesterone, estrogen, magnesium, riluzole, polyethylene glycol, atorvastatin, inosine, and pioglitazone. The literature was systematically reviewed to examine studies in which an in vivo animal model was utilized to assess the efficacy of the therapy in a traumatic spinal cord injury paradigm. Using these criteria, 122 studies were identified and reviewed in detail. Wide variations exist in the animal species, injury models, and experimental designs reported in the preclinical literature on the therapies reviewed. The review highlights the extent of investigation that has occurred in these specific therapies, and points out gaps in our knowledge that would be potentially valuable prior to human translation. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|