Bathseba Motschulsky 1866

Autor: Kumari, Amritha, Moseyko, A. G., Prathapan, K. D.
Rok vydání: 2023
Předmět:
ISSN: 0013-8738
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7968433
Popis: Bathseba Motschulsky, 1866 (Type species B. ferruginosa Motschulsky by monotypy. nec Bathseba Dejean, 1836) Bathseba Motschulsky, 1866: 412;— de Marschall, 1873: 175 —Geminger & Harold, 1874: 3402— Scudder, 1882: 37 — Clavareau, 1914: 178 (catalogue)— Seeno & Wilcox, 1982: 65 (checklist)— Medvedev, 2006: 413. Bathseba Dejean, 1836: 411 (Type species B. transversalis by monotypy) Nomen nudum — D’Orbigny, 1849: 499 — Scudder, 1882: 37 — Sherborn, 1924: 672 ─ Bousquet & Bouchard, 2013: 100. Tricliona Lefèvre, 1885 (Type species Tricliona fasciata Lefèvre, 1885) n. syn. Tricliona Lefèvre, 1885a: 147—1885 b: 141— Clavareau, 1914: 151 (catalogue)— Jacoby, 1908: 469 — Chen, 1935: 289—1940: 489 — Jolivet, 1957: 136 — Gressitt & Kimoto, 1961: 202 — Kimoto & Gressitt, 1982: 101 — Seeno & Wilcox, 1982: 53 (check list)— Kimoto, 1985: 176 — Tan, 1994: 94, 97— Kimoto, 2005: 37 — Tan et al. 2005: 10, 12, 15, 17, 18, 136, 333, 353— Moseyko & Sprecher-Uebersax, 2010: 643 — Moseyko, 2011: 321 — Romantsov & Moseyko, 2016: 306 & 312— Moseyko & Romantsov, 2018: 45. Distribution. India and southern China to the Philippines (Moseyko 2014). With the transfer of T. foveipennis to Gressittella (see below), there is no known species of Bathseba in New Guinea, as given by Moseyko (2014). Generic diagnosis. Body oblong, moderately convex; anterior margin of lateral arms of prosternum strongly convex; compound eyes sinuate at inner side, vertex sulcate above eyes; antennae subfiliform; pronotum broader than long, narrower than elytra with sides entire and rounded; elytra punctate striate; all femora toothed, tooth on anterior femora very prominent and triangular, intermediate and posterior tibiae emarginated preapically without apical tibial spurs; claws bifid. Remarks. Medvedev (2006) redescribed and figured the claw of B. ferruginosa as simple. However, on examination of the type specimen, it was observed that there is indeed a shorter and narrower inner lobe of claw as in a few other species of Tricliona. In the Sri Lankan species of Bathseba, including a few undescribed ones, the inner lobe of claw is shorter. Evidently the development of the inner lobe of the claw is variable and cannot be used to reliably separate these genera. Apart from this, there is no character to reliably separate Tricliona from Bathseba. Genera closely related to Bathseba are Rhyparida Baly, 1861 and Cleoporus Lefèvre, 1884. Rhyparida is an Australian and Indo-Malayan genus. Bathseba and Cleoporus are Oriental. All the three belong to the Tribe Typophorini. Bathseba and Rhyparida differ from each other in the following characters: lateral arms of prosternum convex in Bathseba and concave in Rhyparida; Bathseba has a very large tooth on profemora while Rhyparida has a small tooth or no tooth anteriorly on profemora. Cleoporus has a minute or lacks tooth on profemora, while in Bathseba, the teeth on profemora are well developed. In Cleoporus, the lateral margins of pronotum and elytra are deflexed or not visible from above and the ocular sulci are very broad, while in Bathseba, the lateral margins of pronotum and elytra are visible from above and the ocular sulci are narrow. These characters are variable with in genera. Currently there are 43 named species of Bathseba (see checklist below). Material examined. Types. Lectotype (Figs 1 a ─f). Labels: (1) Bathseba / ferruginosa/ Motch./ Ceylon; (2) LECTOTYPUS / Bathseba / ferruginea Motsch. / L. Medvedev design. Bathseba syzygium, new species (Figs. 2 a–d, 3 a–g, 4 a–e) LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3E90360D-66E7-4B9D-BEB9-4A356FBA5277 Description. Body length 2.8 to 3.9 mm; width 1.6 to 2.4 mm; body oblong-ovate, shiny. Color variable: entirely yellow or brown without maculation (Fig. 2a) to elytra black or black with yellow wavy transverse band medially, apex yellow, humerus yellow in one specimen with black elytra and transverse yellow band (Figs 3a, 3c), head and pronotum yellow to orange brown (Figs 2a–d & 3a–c); yellow specimens rarely with small black round spot on or behind humerus (Fig. 3b); head, pronotum, ventral and pleural areas and legs always yellow to orange brown (Figs 2b & 2c), antennae and palpi yellow with last two or three antennomeres dorsally dark, mandibles red brown, incisor area and a spot on mesal side black, maxillae and labium light yellow. Holotype entirely yellow brown without maculation (Figs 2 a−d). Head (Fig. 2d) inserted, minutely setose with small and minute punctures; coronal sulcus weak but distinct; suprafrontal sulcus weak dorsally; frons and vertex hardly differentiated; supraorbital pore with long seta, supraorbital pore poorly developed, placed inside orbital sulcus adjacent to dorsal margin of eye; orbital sulcus distinct, deep, wide with dorsal margin obtusely angulate above supraorbital pore; antennal calli weak but distinct, nearly subquadrate; frons almost semicircular, concave medially, slopping anteriorly; clypeus much reduced; frontoclypeal suture with row of small setae; labrum broader than long, apical border concave with discontinuous row of setae in middle, pair of widely placed setae medially, anterolateral corners with pair of setae; mandibles deeply bidentate apically; maxillary and labial palpi with three and two palpomeres, each with apical palpomere longest, maxillary palpi with two proximal palpomeres subequal. Compound eyes deeply emarginate near antennal socket, nearly cordiform, vertical diameter of eye 1.2 times transverse diameter, transverse diameter of eye 1.1 − 1.3 times distance between compound eyes, 1.2 − 1.6 times distance between antennal sockets; maximum width of head 2.3 − 2.4 times transverse diameter of eye, 2.7 − 3 times interoccular space, 3.0 − 3.4 times interantennal space. Antennae filiform, extending beyond middle of elytra; first antennomere thick, longer than second, second antennomere thicker than 3 and 4 separately; remaining antennomeres progressively broadened; ratio of length of antennomeres 1 to 11 equals 1: 0.7: 0.5: 0.8: 1: 1: 1.2: 1.1: 1.2: 1.1: 1.3. Pronotum 1.7 times broader than long, posteriorly 1.4 times broader than anteriorly, glabrous with small and minute punctures; posterior border obsoletely lobed; anterior border gently convex medially, weakly concave on either side of middle; lateral margins evenly curved; anterolateral callosity broader than long, slightly protruding laterally, posterolateral callosity not protruding laterally. Lateral arms of prosternum with few minute punctures. Hypomeron unpunctured, glabrous. Prosternum medially longer than broad, sparsely setose with large shallow punctures; mesosternum longer than broad, sparsely punctate, sparsely setose; metasternum minutely punctate without large punctures, sparsely setose. Scutellum longer than broad with narrowly rounded apex. Elytra 1.2 − 1.3 times longer than broad, punctate striate, punctures small, distance between adjacent punctures 3 − 6 times diameter of punctures in middle of elytral disc, distance between rows of punctures longer than distance between punctures in rows; about 10 countable rows evident in post basal area, punctures indistinct towards apical 2/3 rd, scutellar striae almost thrice as long as scutellum. Humeral calli well developed with depression posteriorly and mesally, basal calli weak, post basal depression weak or obsolete, apical angle subacute. Epipleura broadest anteriorly, greatest width being subequal to half width of profemur. Legs long, femur dilated medially with anterior femora strongly dentate, mid- and hindfemur weakly dentate, tibia longitudinally carinate on all sides with row of setae on either side of carina; tarsomeres ventrally fringed with diverse forms of setae. Probasitarsomere and mesobasitarsomere in males ventrally with closely arranged capitate setae bordered by long pointed setae.All basitarsomeres ventrally in females and metabasitarsomere in males fringed with only pointed setae, second tarsomere with pointed setae, and bilobed third tarsomere with variously shaped setae including triangular, inverted arrowhead-shaped, pointed or truncate. Abdominal ventrites finely setose, first ventrite subequal in length to following two combined, ventrites 2 to 4 each shorter than preceeding one, last ventrite subequal to penultimate one. Pygidium with preapical line near to apical edge (Fig. 4e). Male genitalia. Aedeagus in lateral view (Fig. 3e) bent almost at right angle near base, ventral surface feebly concave. In dorsal view (Fig. 3f), sides subparallel; dorsal surface with arrowhead-shaped depression preapically; apex narrowed, nipple shaped, apical opening or ostium partially covered with single lamina. Tegmen (Fig. 3d) with a pair of short anterior arms, parallel sided in middle, posteriorly widened and distinctly lobed. Spiculum gastrale (Fig. 3g) Y-shaped, median arm subequal to lateral arms, spiculum relictum poorly sclerotized, distal margin of 8 th tergite with spindle shaped sclerotization on either side. Female genitalia (Fig. 4a). Spermathecal capsule (SpC) (Fig. 4b) distinctly differentiated into two parts: rod like proximal region with extreme base capitate, flask shaped distal region with concave outer side and convex inner side; pump sickle shaped, longer than receptacle. Bursa copulatrix not distinctly differentiated from vagina. Vaginal wall long, slightly curved proximally. Ovipositor (OP) (Fig. 4d) long, stylus absent. 8 th sternite and 8 th tergite fused laterally to form membranous tube with sclerotizations laterally (Fig. 4c). 8 th sternite with a long tignum longer than ovipositor (Fig. 4c). Remarks. Bathseba syzygium n. sp. closely resembles Bathseba bifasciata (Jacoby, 1895). The new species can be differentiated from the latter by the orbital sulcus with subacutely angulate dorsal margin above supraorbital pore (Fig. 2d) (in B. bifasciata, orbital sulcus with evenly rounded dorsal margin; Fig. 5d). Compound eyes are comparatively larger and legs are comparatively longer in the new species, compared to those in B. bifasciata. Anterior half of vertex is narrower in the new species than in B. bifasciata. The aedeagus is shorter with lateral margins subparallel in the new species where as in B. bifasciata, it is longer and gently narrowed in the middle. Spermatheca of the new species has pump longer than the receptacle (in B. bifasciata, pump is shorter than the receptacle). Another species closely similar to B. syzygium n. sp. is B. inconspicua (Jacoby, 1908) where the anterior portion of vertex is narrower than that in B. syzygium n. sp. Pronotum is more weakly punctured in B. syzygium n. sp. while the same is almost impunctate in B. inconspicua. Preapical line of pygidium is placed far from the apical edge in B. bifasciata (Fig. 4f) whereas in B. syzygium n. sp., preapical line is near to apical edge (Fig. 4e). Prepical line is weakly wavy in B syzygium n. sp., however, it is convex in B. bifasciata. Yellow forms of Bathseba variegata (Jacoby) n. comb. superficially resemble similarly colored specimens of B. syzygium n. sp. and both species exhibit considerable variation in color. However, they can be easily separated by the elytra widest near humerus in dorsal view in B. variegata, while the same is widest in middle in B. syzygium n. sp. In the new species, all elytral puncture rows are regular in posterior 1/3, while at least the sixth row is confused in B. variegata. Etymology. The species name “ syzygium ” refers to the generic name of its host plant, Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels. Distribution. India (Kerala). Host plant. Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels (Myrtaceae). Types. Holotype. ♁ (1) “ India: Kerala / CRS, Pampadumpara / 9 º 48’ 23.7” N 077 º 10’ 4.9”E / AKS & SRH Coll./ Ex. Jamun ”. (2) HOLOTYPE/ Bathseba syzygium sp. nov. / des. Amritha, Moseyko & Prathapan, 2020 (red label) (Accession no. NIM / NBAIR / COL / CHRY /H-270317; NBAIR). Paratypes (19 specimens). 8♀ & 9♁. The same labels as holotype. 1♀ & 1♁. The same labels as holotype except date 23.iv.2018 and without host record [10 NBAIR (Accession nos. NIM/NBAIR/COL/CHRY/P1-270317 to NIM/NBAIR/COL/CHRY/P10-270317), 4 KAU, 5 UASB]. Bathseba bifasciata (Jacoby, 1895) n. comb. (Figs. 4f, 5a–j, 6a–h, 7a–k) Tricliona bifasciata Jacoby, 1895: 284—1908: 474 — Clavareau, 1914: 151 (catalogue)— Seeno & Wilcox, 1982: 53 ─ Medvedev & Sprecher-Uebersax, 1999a: 293 (catalogue)— Medvedev, 2001:167 — Kimoto, 2005: 37 (catalogue)— Moseyko & Sprecher-Uebersax, 2010: 643 (catalogue). Distribution: India (Assam, Darjeeling, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu), Nepal, Bhutan (First report in north-east India and Bhutan). Host plants. Anacardium occidentale L. and Mangifera indica L. (both Anacardiaceae). Redescription. Body length 3.2–4.0 mm; width 2.0– 2.5 mm. Body oblong, shiny, color highly variable (Figs 5a, e–j, 7a–b, g): entirely yellow brown without dark spots or maculations to black with yellow brown elytral apex. Head, elytral apex always red brown or lighter. Pronotum varying from yellow or red brown to black; intermediate forms with a median macula and a lateral spot absent in some specimens. Some specimens with dark maculation or black elytral stripes on a red brown background. Size and shape of dark stripe variable. Elytral suture red brown to black. Venter of lighter specimens generally light brown. Abdominal ventrites piceous in dark forms. Legs yellow or red brown, often with tinges of black near joints. Head (Fig. 5d) inserted, glabrous. Vertex broad with a mixture of small and minute punctures, coronal suture indicated by a depression in middle of vertex; supraorbital pore with short seta, supraorbital pore poorly developed, placed inside orbital sulcus adjacent to dorsal margin of eye; suprafrontal sulcus weakly indicated. Antennal calli weak but distinct, transverse-oblique. Frons minutely punctate, posteriorly depressed with minute setae, anterolateral corners slightly projecting. Clypeus indistinct with numerous fine short setae, merging with frons. Labrum with pair of widely placed setae in middle and group of three setae on each side anterolaterally, broader than long, apex slightly sinuate, apical border with row of setae discontinuous in middle. Mandibles red brown with a few long curved setae laterally. Maxillary and labial palpi light yellow with apical palpomere longest. Maxillary palpi with penultimate palpomere less than half as long as apical; last labial palpomere longer than penultimate. Compound eyes lateral, deeply notched at inner angle. Orbital sulcus deep, bordered with row of minute setae on lateral margin of vertex. Antennae generally yellow or yellow brown, with first four antennomeres light yellow or orange, distal ones being darker; length of antenna variable, not reaching half of elytra or extending up to 3/4 th; first antennomere thicker than second, third and fourth thinner than second, 5–11 progressively and slightly broadened; ratio of length of antennomeres 1 to 11 equals 1: 0.63–0.68: 0.72–0.79: 0.84–1: 0.94–1.21: 0.91–1.15: 0.94–1.2: 0.94–1.23: 1–1.27: 0.97–1.19: 1.25–1.38. Ratio of interantennal space, interocular space, maximum width of head, transverse diameter of eye and vertical diameter of eye equals 1: 1.1–1.78: 2.7–3: 1–1.16: 1.4. Pronotum 1.5–1.8 times wider than long, anteriorly 1.4–1.6 times narrower than posteriorly, convex with mixture of fine and small punctures; sides evenly curved, anterolateral callosity projected forward, posterolateral callosity protruding beyond lateral margin; anterior border straight medially, concave on either side, posterior border indistinctly lobed in middle. Prosternum broad, subquadrate with concave lateral margins, finely setose. Lateral arms of prosternum (Fig. 5c) with very shallow, large but indistinct punctures; anterior border distinctly convex. Hypomeron impunctate, glabrous. Scutellum longer than broad with broadly rounded apex, without setae or punctures. Elytra 1.1–1.3 times longer than wide, regularly punctate striate, punctures indistinct beyond apical third, scutellar striae slightly longer than three times length of scutellum, elytra with ten rows of punctures excluding scutellar row, distance between adjacent rows twice distance between adjacent punctures in row in middle of elytra; distance between adjacent punctures 3–6 times diameter of a puncture in middle of elytra; humeral calli well developed with weak depression posteriorly; basal calli, post basal depression obsolete; humeral angle subobtuse; apical angle obtuse, apex convex. Epipleura outwardly oblique, narrowed beyond middle, narrowly reaching apex. Legs with all femora dentate, middle one weakly dentate, all tibiae dorsally sulcate with sharp ridge along sulcus, meso- and metatibia distinctly emarginate preapically. Claws bifid. Probasitarsomere and mesobasitarsomere in males ventrally with closely arranged capitate setae bordered by long pointed setae. All basitarsomeres in females and metabasitarsomere in males fringed with only pointed setae. Abdominal ventrites (Fig. 5b) finely setose, first ventrite medially longer than following two combined, ventrites 2–4 each shorter than preceding one, 5 th longer than 4 th. Apical border of last ventrite slightly emarginate. Pygidium with preapical line placed distantly from apical edge (Fig. 4f). Male genitalia. Tegmen (Fig. 6c) flat, almost X-shaped with pair of arms anteriorly and posteriorly, anterior arms narrowly acute, posterior arms broad. Aedeagus sharply bent at right angle near base, in lateral view (Fig. 6b), apex acutely narrowed and gently recurved, slightly curved from base to apex; in ventral view (Fig. 6a), aedeagus gently narrowed in middle, broader towards apex with acute apical denticle; ventral surface of aedeagus depressed medially, preapical region depressed and dorsal surface with arrowhead-shaped depression preapically. Spiculum gastrale (second spiculum of Jolivet & Verma 2008) Y-shaped with lateral arms almost straight, stem distinctly bent at proximal end. Tergite VIII with spindle shaped sclerotization on either side and a few setae on posterior margin; spic
Published as part of Kumari, Amritha, Moseyko, A. G. & Prathapan, K. D., 2023, A new synonym of Bathseba Motschulsky, 1866 (Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae Typophorini) with a new species and redescription of B. bifasciata (Jacoby, 1895) n. comb. and other taxonomic and biological notes, pp. 122-144 in Zootaxa 5293 (1) on pages 124-138, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5293.1.5, http://zenodo.org/record/7959849
{"references":["Motschulsky, V. (1866) Essai d'un catalogue de sinsectes de l'ile de Ceylan. Bulletin de la Societe Imperiale des Naturalistes de Moscou, 39 (2), 393 - 446.","Dejean, P. F. M. A. (1836) Catalogue des Coleopteres de la collection de M. le Comte Dejean. chez Mequignon-Marvis, Paris, pp. 361 - 443. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / t. 173109","de Marschall, A. (1873) Nomenclator zoologicus continens nomina systematica generum animalium tam viventium quam fossilium, secundum ordinem alphabeticum disposita. C. Ueberreuter, Vindobonae, 482 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 1216","Scudder, S. H. (1882) An alphabetical list of all generic names that have been employed by naturalists for recent and fossil animals from the earliest times to the close of the year 1879. (Nomenclator Zoologicus). Bulletin of the United States National Museum 19, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 340 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 1143","Clavareau, H. (1914) Chrysomelidae: 11. Eumolpinae pars 59. In: Junk W. & Schenkling S. (Eds.), Coleopterorum Catalogus. Vol. 15. W. Junk. Berlin, pp. 1 - 215.","Seeno, T. N. & Wilcox, J. A. (1982) Leaf beetle genera. Entomography, 1, 1 - 221.","Medvedev, L. N. (2006) To the knowledge of Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) described by V. Motschulsky. Russian Entomological Journal, 15 (4), 409 - 417.","D'Orbigny, C. M. (1849) Dictionnaire Universel D'histoire Naturelle. Tome Deuxieme. MM. Renard, Martinet, Et, Paris, 795 pp.","Sherborn, C. D. (1924) Index animalium sivc index nominum quac ab A. D. MDCCLVIII generibus et speciebus animalium imposita sunt (Sectio secunda). British Museum, London, 943 pp.","Bousquet, Y. & Bouchard, P. (2013) The genera in the second catalogue (1833 - 1836) of Dejean's Coleoptera collection. ZooKeys, 282, 1 - 219. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 282.4401","Lefevre, E. (1885 a) Meeting of August 26, 1885, presidency of Mr. Em. L, Ragonot. Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 1885, cxlvii.","Jacoby, M. (1908) Coleoptera. Chrysomelidae. Vol. 1. In: Bingham, C. T. (Ed.), The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 1 - 534.","Chen, S. H. (1935) Study on the Chinese eumolpid beetles. Sinensia, 6 (3), 221 - 387.","Jolivet, P. (1957) Recherches sur l'aile des Chrysomeloidea (Coleoptera) (premiere partie). Mkmoires de l'lnstitut Royale des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 1957, 1 - 180.","Gressitt, J. L. & Kimoto, S. (1961) The Chrysomelidae (Coleopt.) of China and Korea, part 1. Pacific Insects Monograph, 1 A, 1 - 299.","Kimoto, S. & Gressitt, J. L. (1982) Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) of Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. III. Eumolpinae. Esakia, 18, 1 - 141. https: // doi. org / 10.5109 / 2421","Kimoto, S. (1985) Check-list of Chrysomelidae of South East Asia, South of Thailand and West of Irian-Jaya of Indonesia, IV. Eumolpinae, 2, Kurume University Journal, 34 (2), 153 - 177.","Tan, J. (1994) On the distributional patterns of the genera of Chinese Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: Eumolpidae). Wuyi Science Journal, 11, 93 - 99. [in Chinese]","Kimoto, S. (2005) Systematic Catalog of the Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) from Nepal and Bhutan. Bulletin of Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History & Human History, Series A, 3, 13 - 114.","Tan, J., Wang, S. & Zhou, H. (2005) Fauna sinica insect Vol. 40 Coleoptera: Eumolpidae. Eumolpinae. Science Press, Beijing, 415 pp. [in Chinese]","Moseyko, A. G. & Sprecher-Uebersax, E. (2010) Subfamily Eumolpinae Hope, 1840. In: Lobl, I. & Smetana, A. (Eds.), Catalogue of Paleartic Coleoptera. Vol. 6. Chrysomeloidea. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, pp. 619 - 643.","Moseyko A. G. (2011) K poznaniyu zhukov-listoedov tribi Nodinini (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae) s Philippinskih ostrovov i o. Kalimantan. Entomologicheskoe obozrenie, 90 (2), 358 - 374 (in Russian).","Romantsov, P. V. & Moseyko, A. G. (2016) To the knowledge of the leaf-beetle genera Rhyparida and Tricliona (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Eumolpinae) from Indochina and Malay Peninsula. Zoosystematica Rossica, 25 (2), 299 - 313. https: // doi. org / 10.31610 / zsr / 2016.25.2.299","Moseyko, A. G. & Romantsov, P. V. (2018) Descriptions of males of Tricliona melanura Lefevre, 1890 and T. pakensis Kimoto et Gressitt, 1982 with an updated key to Tricliona Lefevre, 1885 with punctured frons from Indochina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Eumolpinae). Caucasian Entomological Bulletin, 14 (1), 43 - 45. https: // doi. org / 10.23885 / 1814 - 3326 - 2018 - 14 - 1 - 43 - 45","Moseyko, A. G. (2014) A Redescription of Tricliona fasciata Lefevre, 1885 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae) and changes in a list of the Genus Tricliona Lefevre, 1885. Entomological Review, 94 (7), 1004 - 1009. https: // doi. org / 10.1134 / S 0013873814070094","Baly, J. S. (1861) Descriptions of new genera and species of Phytophaga. The Journal of Entomology Descriptive and Geographical, 1, 275 - 302.","Lefevre, E. (1884) Seancs du 9 Janvier 1884. Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 2, lxxvi - lxxvii.","Jacoby, M. (1895) Descriptions of the new species of Phytophagous Coleoptera obtained by M Andrewes in India. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de Belgique, 39, 252 - 288.","Medvedev, L. N. & Sprecher-Uebersax, E. (1999 a) Kalalog der Chrysomelidae von Nepal. Entomologica Basiliensia, 21, 261 - 354.","Medvedev, L. N. (2001) Chrysomelidae of southern Asia (Coleoptera). Entomologica Basiliensia, 23, 159 - 191.","Jolivet, P. & Verma, K. K. (2008) Eumolpinae - a widely distributed and much diversified subfamily of leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews, 1, 3 - 37. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 187498308 X 345424","Selman, B. J. (1963) A revision of the genus Deretrichia Weise (Coleoptera: Eumolpidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 14 (4), 153 - 196. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 8781","Crowson, R. A. (1981) The biology of the Coleoptera. Academic Press, London, xii + 802 pp.","Laporte, M. F. L. (1833) Memoire sur les divisions du genre Colaspis. Revue Entomologique, 1, 18 - 25.","Kumari, A., Moseyko, A. G., Strother, M. S. & Prathapan, K. D. (2020) Neofidia Strother, new name for Fidia Baly, 1863 and redescription of Fidia kanaraensis (Jacoby, 1895) with a new host record and notes on natural history (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae). European Journal of Taxonomy, 654, 1 - 25. https: // doi. org / 10.5852 / ejt. 2020.654","Flowers, R. W. (1999) Internal structure and phylogenetic importance of male genitalia in Eumolpinae, In: Cox, M. L. (Ed.), Advances in Chrysomelid Biology 1. Backhuys, Leiden, pp. 71 - 93."]}
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: