Variability in the Water Footprint of Arable Crop Production across European Regions

Autor: Miroslav Trnka, Triin Saue, J.G. Kroes, Anna Dalla Marta, B. Lalic, Anne Gobin, Domenico Ventrella, Kurt Christian Kersebaum, Johannes Deelstra, Ari Rajala, Josef Eitzinger, Petr Hlavinka, Christos Zoumides, Jozef Takáč, Ruzica Stričevic, Simone Orlandini, Višnja Vučetić, Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, Pavol Nejedlik, Levent Şaylan
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
water footprint
arable crops
cereals
Europe
crop water use
yield
Irrigation
lcsh:Hydraulic engineering
Water en Landgebruik
0208 environmental biotechnology
Geography
Planning and Development

02 engineering and technology
Aquatic Science
Biochemistry
Crop
Water balance
Soil
Bodem
Soil
Water and Land Use

lcsh:Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
lcsh:TC1-978
Drainage
TD201-500
Water Science and Technology
2. Zero hunger
lcsh:TD201-500
Water supply for domestic and industrial purposes
Crop yield
Water and Land Use
Hydraulic engineering
04 agricultural and veterinary sciences
15. Life on land
6. Clean water
Bodem
Water en Landgebruik

020801 environmental engineering
Agronomy
13. Climate action
040103 agronomy & agriculture
0401 agriculture
forestry
and fisheries

Environmental science
Arable land
TC1-978
Surface runoff
Water use
Zdroj: Water (Switzerland)
Water, Vol 9, Iss 2, p 93 (2017)
Water; Volume 9; Issue 2; Pages: 93
Water
Water (Switzerland) 9 (2017) 2
Water (Switzerland), 9(2), 9-9
Water, 9(2): 93
Norwegian Open Research Archives
DOAJ-Articles
ISSN: 2073-4441
Popis: Crop growth and yield are affected by water use during the season: the green water footprint (WF) accounts for rain water, the blue WF for irrigation and the grey WF for diluting agri-chemicals. We calibrated crop yield for FAO’s water balance model “Aquacrop” at field level. We collected weather, soil and crop inputs for 45 locations for the period 1992–2012. Calibrated model runs were conducted for wheat, barley, grain maize, oilseed rape, potato and sugar beet. The WF of cereals could be up to 20 times larger than the WF of tuber and root crops; the largest share was attributed to the green WF. The green and blue WF compared favourably with global benchmark values (R2 = 0.64–0.80; d = 0.91–0.95). The variability in the WF of arable crops across different regions in Europe is mainly due to variability in crop yield (cv = 45%) and to a lesser extent to variability in crop water use (cv = 21%). The WF variability between countries (cv = 14%) is lower than the variability between seasons (cv = 22%) and between crops (cv = 46%). Though modelled yields increased up to 50% under sprinkler irrigation, the water footprint still increased between 1% and 25%. Confronted with drainage and runoff, the grey WF tended to overestimate the contribution of nitrogen to the surface and groundwater. The results showed that the water footprint provides a measurable indicator that may support European water governance. Variability in the Water Footprint of Arable Crop Production across European Regions
Databáze: OpenAIRE