| Autor: |
Azmaeen Zarif, Rhea Mittal, Ben Popham, Imogen C Vorley, Jessy Jindal, Emily C Morris |
| Rok vydání: |
2021 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of medical ethics. |
| ISSN: |
1473-4257 |
| Popis: |
Authoritarian governments are characterised by political systems with concentrated and centralised power. Healthcare is a critical component of any state. Given the powers of an authoritarian regime, we consider the opportunities they possess to derive good health outcomes. The 2019 Varsity Medical Ethics Debate convened on the motion: ‘This house believes authoritarian government is the route to good health outcomes’ with Oxford as the Proposition and Cambridge as the Opposition. This article summarises and extends key arguments made during the 11th annual debate between medical students from the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge. By contrasting the principles underlying authoritarianism and democracy, it enables a discussion into how they translate into healthcare provision and the outcomes derived. Based on the foundation of said principles, an exploration of select cases represents examples of applications and the results. We analyse the past, present and future implications on the basis of fundamental patient-centred care. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
