Acquaintance rape: the effect of race of defendant and race of victim on white juror decisions
Autor: | Sandra Rowe, Robert W. Hymes, Mary Leinart, William Rogers |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1993 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male Social Psychology media_common.quotation_subject education Poison control Stereotype White People Acquaintance rape Race (biology) Criminal Law Humans media_common White (horse) digestive oral and skin physiology social sciences Race Relations humanities Cognitive bias United States Black or African American Social Perception Rape behavior and behavior mechanisms Guilt Female Psychology Attribution Social psychology Sentence Prejudice |
Zdroj: | The Journal of social psychology. 133(5) |
ISSN: | 0022-4545 |
Popis: | Racial bias appears to lead jurors in trials of stranger rape to convict Black defendants more readily and to sentence them more harshly than White defendants. It was hypothesized that jurors in an acquaintance rape case would demonstrate a different pattern of bias, based not only on the race of the defendant but also on the racial nature of the defendant-victim relationship. White American undergraduates read a trial transcript that established defendant-victim familiarity and sexual contact but was ambiguous about the victim's consent. Race of defendant and of victim (Black or White) were varied on a 2 × 2 design. The participants were asked to rate the guilt of the defendant and to recommend a sentence. Both Black and White defendants were rated as more guilty when the victim's race differed from their own. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |