Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study
Autor: | Barbara M. Bates-Jensen, Heather McCreath, Anabel Patlan, Deniz Harputlu |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Physical Injury - Accidents and Adverse Effects Clinical Sciences Objective data Dermatology Article Functionally dependent 030207 dermatology & venereal diseases 03 medical and health sciences Wound assessment 0302 clinical medicine Clinical Research Internal medicine 80 and over Medicine Humans Longitudinal Studies Stage (cooking) Anatomic Location Reliability (statistics) Aged Skin Aged 80 and over Pressure Ulcer Wound Healing Trauma Severity Indices Pressure injury business.industry Prevention Dermatology & Venereal Diseases Reproducibility of Results Injuries and accidents Surgery Female business Nursing homes |
Zdroj: | Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, vol 27, iss 4 Wound Repair Regen |
Popis: | The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) is used to assess wound healing in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate BWAT use among nursing home residents with pressure injury. Findings and reliability estimates from the BWAT related to pressure injury characteristics (stage, anatomic location) and natural history (resolved, persisted) among 142 ethnically and racially diverse residents are reported. In this prospective 16-week study, 305 pressure injuries among 142 participants (34% prevalence) are described by stage, anatomic location, and BWAT scores. Visual and subepidermal moisture assessments were obtained from sacrum, buttock, ischial, and heel ulcers weekly. Participants were 14% Asian, 28% Black, 18% Hispanic, 40% White with a mean age of 78 ± 14 years, and were 62% female; 80% functionally dependent (bed mobility extensive/total assistance) and at risk (Braden Scale score 14 ± 2.7). The reliability coefficient for BWAT score (all participants, all anatomic locations) was high (r = 0.90; p |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |