Towards an Empirical Evaluation of Imperative and Declarative Process Mining

Autor: Christoffer Olling Back, Tijs Slaats, Søren Debois
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Advances in Conceptual Modeling-ER 2018 Workshops Emp-ER, MoBiD, MREBA, QMMQ, SCME, Xian, China, October 22-25, 2018, Proceedings
Advances in Conceptual Modeling-ER 2018 Workshops Emp-ER, MoBiD, MREBA, QMMQ, SCME, Xi'an, China, October 22-25, 2018, Proceedings
Lecture Notes in Computer Science ISBN: 9783030013905
ER Workshops
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01391-2_24
Popis: Process modelling notations fall in two broad categories: declarative notations, which specify the rules governing a process; and imperative notations, which specify the flows admitted by a process. We outline an empirical approach to addressing the question of whether certain process logs are better suited for mining to imperative than declarative notations. We plan to attack this question by applying a flagship imperative and declarative miner to a standard collection of process logs, then evaluate the quality of the output models w.r.t. the standard model metrics of precision and generalisation. This approach requires perfect fitness of the output model, which substantially narrows the field of available miners; possible candidates include Inductive Miner and MINERful. With the metrics in hand, we propose to statistically evaluate the hypotheses that (1) one miner consistently outperforms the other on one of the metrics, and (2) there exist subsets of logs more suitable for imperative respectively declarative mining.
Databáze: OpenAIRE