Are you better? A multi-centre study of patient-defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Autor: | Tanja Schlereth, David Shulman, Lone Knudsen, Alison Llewellyn, R G S M Perez, L Davies, Ilona Thomassen, Florian Brunner, Richard C Haigh, Francois Gobeil, Johan Marinus, Andrzej Zyluk, Robyn Connett, P Moskovitz, Paul D. White, R N Harden, Candy McCabe, C Sontheim, Andreas Goebel, H Small, Frank Birklein, Christian Maihöfner, Yvette Hibberd |
---|---|
Přispěvatelé: | VU University medical center, University of Zurich, Llewellyn, A |
Jazyk: | angličtina |
Rok vydání: | 2018 |
Předmět: |
Adult
Male medicine.medical_specialty Activities of daily living Adolescent Delphi Technique medicine.medical_treatment MEDLINE Psychological intervention Delphi method 610 Medicine & health 03 medical and health sciences Young Adult 0302 clinical medicine 030202 anesthesiology Activities of Daily Living medicine Humans Patient Reported Outcome Measures Young adult Range of Motion Articular Qualitative Research Aged Pain Measurement Aged 80 and over Analgesics Rehabilitation business.industry Extremities Recovery of Function Middle Aged medicine.disease Europe Complex regional pain syndrome Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Physical therapy 10046 Balgrist University Hospital Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center Female 2703 Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine business 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Complex Regional Pain Syndromes Qualitative research |
Zdroj: | Llewellyn, A, McCabe, CS, Hibberd, Y, White, P, Davies, L, Marinus, J, Perez, RGSM, Thomassen, I, Brunner, F, Sontheim, C, Birklein, F, Schlereth, T, Goebel, A, Haigh, R, Connett, R, Maihöfner, C, Knudsen, L, Harden, RN, Zyluk, A, Schulman, D, Small, H, Gobeil, F & Moskovitz, P 2018, ' Are you better? A multi-centre study of patient-defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ', European Journal of Pain, vol. 22, pp. 551-564 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1138 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom), 22(3), 551-564. Wiley-Blackwell Llewellyn, A, McCabe, C S, Hibberd, Y, White, P, Davies, L, Marinus, J, Perez, R G S M, Thomassen, I, Brunner, F, Sontheim, C, Birklein, F, Schlereth, T, Goebel, A, Haigh, R, Connett, R, Maihöfner, C, Knudsen, L, Harden, R N, Zyluk, A, Shulman, D, Small, H, Gobeil, F & Moskovitz, P 2018, ' Are you better? A multi-centre study of patient-defined recovery from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ', European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom), vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 551-564 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1138 |
ISSN: | 1090-3801 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ejp.1138 |
Popis: | © 2017 European Pain Federation - EFIC® Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) symptoms can significantly differ between patients, fluctuate over time, disappear or persist. This leads to problems in defining recovery and in evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Objectives: To define recovery from the patients’ perspective and better understand their priorities for treatment approaches. Methods: Establishing an international consortium, we used a 2-Round Delphi-based study in eight countries across Europe and North America. Participants ≥18years who met, or had met, Budapest clinical criteria were included. Round 1 participants completed the statement: ‘I would/do consider myself recovered from CRPS if/because…’ alongside demographic and health questionnaires. Data were thematically organised and represented as 62 statements, from which participants identified and ranked their recovery priorities in Round 2. Results: Round 1 (N=347, 80% female, 91% non-recovered) dominant ICF themes were: activities of daily living; bodily functions; external factors; participation and personal factors. The top five priority statements in Round 2 (N=252) were: no longer having (1) CRPS-related pain, (2) generalised pain and discomfort, (3) restricted range of movement, (4) need for medication, (5) stiffness in the affected limb. With very few exceptions, priorities were consistent, irrespective of patient demographics/geography. Symptoms affecting daily activities were among those most frequently reported. Conclusions: Our data showed a small number of themes are of highest importance to CRPS patients’ definition of recovery. Patients want their pain, movement restriction and reliance on medication to be addressed, above all other factors. These factors should therefore be foremost concerns for future treatment and rehabilitation programmes. Significance: Those with longstanding CRPS may no longer meet diagnostic criteria but still be symptomatic. Defining recovery is therefore problematic in CRPS. Our study has identified patients’ definition of recovery from CRPS, in order of priority, as relief from: their CRPS-related pain, generalised pain, movement restriction, reliance on medication, and stiffness. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |