Biased Symptom Reporting and Antisocial Behaviour in Forensic Samples: A Weak Link

Autor: Marko Jelicic, Joost à Campo, Alfons van Impelen, Benno Huhnt, Isabella J. M. Niesten, Harald Merckelbach
Přispěvatelé: Criminal Law and Criminology, Section Forensic Psychology, RS: FPN CPS IV, RS: FdR Strafrecht en Criminologie, RS: FdR Institute MICS
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 24(4), 530-548. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group
Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law
ISSN: 1321-8719
Popis: In two studies (one with 57 forensic inpatients and one with 45 prisoners) the connection between biased symptom reporting and antisocial behaviour is explored. The findings are as follows: 1) the association between symptom over-reporting and antisocial features is a) present in self-report measures, but not in behavioural measures, and b) stronger in the punitive setting than in the therapeutic setting; and 2) participants who over-report symptoms a) are prone to attribute blame for their offence to mental disorders, and b) tend to report heightened levels of antisocial features, but the reverse is not true. The data provide little support for the inclusion of antisocial behaviour (i.e. antisocial personality disorder) as a signal of symptom over-reporting (i.e. malingering) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The empirical literature on symptom over-reporting and antisocial/psychopathic behaviour is discussed and it is argued that the utility of antisocial behaviour as an indicator of biased symptom reporting is unacceptably low.
Databáze: OpenAIRE