Use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor: | Mohan S Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Mariano Mascarenhas, Priya Bhave Chittawar |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
0301 basic medicine
medicine.medical_specialty Pregnancy Rate Reproductive Techniques Assisted medicine.medical_treatment Population Endometrium 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Pregnancy Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor medicine Humans Embryo Implantation education Adverse effect Gynecology education.field_of_study 030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine Assisted reproductive technology Obstetrics business.industry Obstetrics and Gynecology Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 030104 developmental biology medicine.anatomical_structure Reproductive Medicine Relative risk Meta-analysis Female Live birth business |
Zdroj: | European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 214 |
ISSN: | 1872-7654 |
Popis: | Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a glycoprotein, has been used in women undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). We decided to undertake a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of G-CSF in women with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) undergoing ART. The outcomes included an increase in endometrial thickness, live birth, clinical pregnancy rates and adverse effects. We included two trials evaluating women with thin endometrium and another two trials evaluating women with RIF. The pooled data did not reveal statistically significant increase in endometrial thickness following G-CSF in women with thin endometrium (mean difference 0.47, 95% CI -1.36-2.31; I2 82%). However significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate was noted (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.09-5.40; I2 0%) following G-CSF compared to no intervention and quality of evidence for both these outcomes was very low. In RIF population, the administration of G-CSF was associated with a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate compared to no intervention with pooled risk ratio of 2.51 (95% CI 1.36-4.63; I2 0%) and quality of evidence being low. Findings of current review suggest a possible benefit of G-CSF in women with thin endometrium undergoing ART and RIF. However these findings need to be further validated in larger trials before G-CSF can be used in routine clinical practice. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |