RAM‐SCB simulations of electron transport and plasma wave scattering during the October 2012 'double‐dip' storm
Autor: | A. Panaitescu, Steven K. Morley, Yue Chen, Geoffrey D. Reeves, Vania K. Jordanova, Craig Kletzing, Weichao Tu |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2016 |
Předmět: |
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences
Electron Atmospheric sciences 01 natural sciences symbols.namesake Energetic Particles: Trapped inner magnetosphere 0103 physical sciences Magnetospheric Physics Van Allen Probes Pitch angle Ionosphere Numerical Modeling 010303 astronomy & astrophysics Research Articles Physics::Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Plasma Waves and Instabilities 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Physics Waves in plasmas Scattering geomagnetic storms Energetic Particles: Precipitating Computational physics Magnetic field Geophysics Big Storms of the Van Allen Probes Era 13. Climate action Space and Planetary Science Local time Van Allen radiation belt Physics::Space Physics symbols Ring Current Research Article |
Zdroj: | Journal of Geophysical Research. Space Physics |
ISSN: | 2169-9402 2169-9380 |
DOI: | 10.1002/2016ja022470 |
Popis: | Mechanisms for electron injection, trapping, and loss in the near‐Earth space environment are investigated during the October 2012 “double‐dip” storm using our ring current‐atmosphere interactions model with self‐consistent magnetic field (RAM‐SCB). Pitch angle and energy scattering are included for the first time in RAM‐SCB using L and magnetic local time (MLT)‐dependent event‐specific chorus wave models inferred from NOAA Polar‐orbiting Operational Environmental Satellites (POES) and Van Allen Probes Electric and Magnetic Field Instrument Suite and Integrated Science observations. The dynamics of the source (approximately tens of keV) and seed (approximately hundreds of keV) populations of the radiation belts simulated with RAM‐SCB is compared with Van Allen Probes Magnetic Electron Ion Spectrometer observations in the morning sector and with measurements from NOAA 15 satellite in the predawn and afternoon MLT sectors. We find that although the low‐energy (E< 100 keV) electron fluxes are in good agreement with observations, increasing significantly by magnetospheric convection during both SYM‐H dips while decreasing during the intermediate recovery phase, the injection of high‐energy electrons is underestimated by this mechanism throughout the storm. Local acceleration by chorus waves intensifies the electron fluxes at E≥50 keV considerably, and RAM‐SCB simulations overestimate the observed trapped fluxes by more than an order of magnitude; the precipitating fluxes simulated with RAM‐SCB are weaker, and their temporal and spatial evolutions agree well with POES/Medium Energy Proton and Electron Detectors data. Key Points First RAM‐SCB simulations with 2‐D (MLT‐ and L‐dependent) event‐specific chorus wave models inferred from LEO and RBSP dataThe measured low‐energy trapped and precipitating electron fluxes are well reproduced by magnetospheric convectionLocal acceleration by chorus waves intensifies the electron fluxes at energies E greater than approximately 50 keV and overestimates observations |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |