Influence of surgical experience on the efficiency of discectomy in TLIF: a cadaveric testing in 40 levels
Autor: | Jaspaul Gogia, Suhel Kotwal, Matthias Pumberger, Alexander P. Hughes, Federico P. Girardi, Andrew A. Sama, Christoph Thaler |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
Time Factors medicine.medical_treatment Lumbar discectomy Quadrant (abdomen) Random Allocation Professional Competence Cadaver Discectomy medicine Medical Staff Hospital Prone Position Humans Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Single-Blind Method Fellowships and Scholarships Lumbar Vertebrae business.industry Significant difference Surgery Prone position Orthopedics Spinal Fusion Orthopedic surgery Neurology (clinical) business Cadaveric spasm Diskectomy |
Zdroj: | Journal of spinal disorderstechniques. 25(8) |
ISSN: | 1539-2465 |
Popis: | Study design Cadaveric study. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of surgical experience on the efficiency of lumbar discectomy in open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Summary of background data There is limited knowledge about the efficiency of discectomy among surgeons. As a first study, we are evaluating the effect of surgical experience on it. Methods Manual and powered discectomies were randomized and performed by 3 attending spine surgeons and 2 clinical spine fellows. Each discectomy procedure was analyzed for the area of complete endplate preparation, total elapsed time, and number of instrument passes. The surface area of discectomy at each endplate was measured utilizing digital imaging and the appropriate software. For the purpose of the analysis, the superior and the inferior endplates were divided into ipsilateral and contralateral halves, and each half was further divided into ventral and dorsal quadrants. Each quadrant was analyzed in a blinded manner by 2 observers. Results A total of 40 discectomies were performed on 9 fresh-frozen cadaveric torsos between the levels T12 and S1. A powered discectomy device was used in levels 9 and 11 by the attendings. Manual discectomy was performed in 11 levels by the spine fellows and 9 by the spine attendings. No significant difference was observed between the spine fellows and spine attendings when the manual instruments were used (P = 0.924). However, the spine attending surgeon group had a significantly increased total area of discectomy compared with the fellows (P = 0.003). No significant difference was observed between the groups when instrument passes or the total elapsed time were compared either utilizing the manual or the powered technique. Conclusions Our results demonstrate that a satisfactory discectomy may be performed by surgeons with relatively less surgical experience in the transforaminal approach using a powered discectomy device. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |