Reliability and validity of autism diagnostic interview-revised, Japanese version
| Autor: | Masako Taniike, Taishi Miyachi, Miho Kuroda, Saeko Sakai, Eiko Inokuchi, Atsuko Yagi, Norio Mori, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Ikuko Mohri, Kenji J. Tsuchiya, Ryoichiro Iwanaga, Masahiko Inoue, Tomonori Koyama, Kei Ogasahara, Ken Miyamoto, Shuji Kobayashi, Taku Hagiwara, Hironobu Ichikawa, Kaori Matsumoto, Katsuaki Suzuki, Yoko Kamio, Iori Tani, Tokio Uchiyama, Nori Takei, Masafumi Ohnishi, Naoko Inada, Shunji Nakajima, Kazuyo Nomura, Masatsugu Tsujii |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2012 |
| Předmět: |
Male
medicine.medical_specialty Psychometrics Adolescent Intraclass correlation Test validity Sensitivity and Specificity Young Adult Asian People Japan Surveys and Questionnaires Interview Psychological Developmental and Educational Psychology medicine Humans Autistic Disorder Psychiatry Child Pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified Autism Diagnostic Interview Discriminant validity Reproducibility of Results medicine.disease Inter-rater reliability Child Development Disorders Pervasive Child Preschool Autism Female Psychology |
| Zdroj: | Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 43(3) |
| ISSN: | 1573-3432 |
| Popis: | To examine the inter-rater reliability of Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised, Japanese Version (ADI-R-JV), the authors recruited 51 individuals aged 3-19 years, interviewed by two independent raters. Subsequently, to assess the discriminant and diagnostic validity of ADI-R-JV, the authors investigated 317 individuals aged 2-19 years, who were divided into three diagnostic groups as follows: autistic disorder (AD), pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified, and other psychiatric diagnosis or no diagnosis, according to the consensus clinical diagnosis. As regards inter-rater reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients of greater than 0.80 were obtained for all three domains of ADI-R-JV. As regards discriminant validity, the mean scores of the three domains was significantly higher in individuals with AD than in those of other diagnostic groups. As regards diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity for correctly diagnosing AD were 0.92 and 0.89, respectively, but sensitivity was 0.55 for individuals younger than 5 years. Specificity was consistently high regardless of age and intelligence. ADI-R-JV was shown to be a reliable tool, and has sufficient discriminant validity and satisfactory diagnostic validity for correctly diagnosing AD, although the diagnostic validity appeared to be compromised with respect to the diagnosis of younger individuals. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink