Does Patient Position Influence Doppler Signal Quality from the USCOM Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor?
| Autor: | Shashi Kanth Manikappa, John Monagle, Adam Paul Tucker, Lyndon Siu |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2008 |
| Předmět: |
Adult
Cardiac output Time Factors Supine position Posture Trendelenburg Pulmonary Artery Sitting Head-Down Tilt Random Allocation symbols.namesake Predictive Value of Tests Reference Values Laser-Doppler Flowmetry Supine Position Humans Medicine Prospective Studies Cardiac Output Aorta Monitoring Physiologic Ultrasonography Cross-Over Studies business.industry Reproducibility of Results Signal Processing Computer-Assisted Middle Aged Laser Doppler velocimetry Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Transducer Anesthesia symbols business Doppler effect Blood Flow Velocity Biomedical engineering |
| Zdroj: | Anesthesia & Analgesia. 106:1798-1802 |
| ISSN: | 0003-2999 |
| DOI: | 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181732127 |
| Popis: | Background The USCOM1A continuous wave cardiac output monitor (USCOM Pty Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia) is a novel Doppler-based device used to measure cardiac output noninvasively. The proper alignment of the transducer, and hence the ultrasound beam to the aortic or pulmonary outflow tracts, is essential to acquire accurate measurements and often much time is spent on transducer and/or patient positioning. In this prospective, observational, crossover study, we investigated the effect of patient positioning on the acquisition of cardiac output measurement with USCOM1A. Methods We measured cardiac output using USCOM1A in 30 healthy adult volunteers, each in five different positions: sitting, supine, Trendelenburg (20 degrees), left lateral tilt (20 degrees), and right lateral tilt (20 degrees) and compared the time required to obtain acceptable measurements. We also compared the quality of the Doppler signal obtained in these positions using a scoring system designed for this study. Results There was a higher rate of failed measurement, the mean time to obtain the first acceptable measurement was prolonged and the optimal measurement obtained within a 5-min period was of a lower quality in the sitting position compared with the other four positions. Conclusions Our results suggested the sitting position is the least suitable and least reliable position in which to perform cardiac output measurements using USCOM1A compared with the supine, Trendelenburg (20 degrees), left lateral tilt (20 degrees), and right lateral tilt (20 degrees) positions. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|