Underestimation of aortic valve area in calcified aortic valve disease: Effects of left ventricular outflow tract ellipticity
Autor: | Takayuki Hidaka, Takenori Okada, Jun Horiguchi, Hideya Yamamoto, Yasuki Kihara, Eiji Kunita, Ryo Yamazato, Hiroto Utsunomiya |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2012 |
Předmět: |
Male
Aortic valve medicine.medical_specialty Calcified aortic valve Heart Valve Diseases Computed tomography Ventricular Outflow Obstruction Internal medicine Multidetector Computed Tomography Humans Medicine Ventricular outflow tract In patient Prospective Studies Vascular Calcification Aged Ultrasonography medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Middle Aged medicine.disease Stenosis Treatment Outcome Aortic valve area medicine.anatomical_structure Aortic Valve cardiovascular system Cardiology Female Left ventricular outflow tract area Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine business |
Zdroj: | International Journal of Cardiology. 157:347-353 |
ISSN: | 0167-5273 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.071 |
Popis: | The aortic valve area (AVA) is usually calculated using the continuity equation (CE) in which the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) area is estimated assuming circular geometry. We sought to evaluate the LVOT ellipticity with 64-multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and to assess the impact of LVOT ellipticity on the evaluation of CE-based AVA in patients with calcified aortic valves.We prospectively studied 110 patients with calcified aortic valves including 54 aortic stenosis (AS) with both 64-MDCT and transthoracic echocardiography. Double oblique transversal images for planimetry of the aortic valve and LVOT were obtained during the midsystolic phase. The short and long-axis diameters of the planimetered LVOT were measured.The MDCT planimetered LVOT area was underestimated by the diameter-derived (π × r(2)) LVOT area using echocardiography (444 ± 70 mm(2) versus 369 ± 63 mm(2); p0.001). The mean difference in AVA values calculated using the CE and planimetry was 0.43 ± 0.23 cm(2) and mean measurement error of CE-based AVA was 18%. When the CE-based AVA was corrected using the MDCT planimetered LVOT area, the measurement error decreased from 28 ± 5 to 5 ± 2% in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AVA1.0 cm(2)), whereas from 16 ± 5 to 3 ± 6% in others.Ellipticity of LVOT is associated with underestimation of AVA measurements using the CE. CE-based AVA corrected with MDCT planimetered LVOT area is useful especially in severe AS. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |