Echinocandins Compared to Fluconazole for Candidemia of a Urinary Tract Source: A Propensity Score Analysis

Autor: Francesc Marco, Patricia Muñoz, Benito Almirante, for Grupo de Estudio de Micología Médica, Carolina Garcia-Vidal, Josefina Ayats, Eva González-Barberá, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa, Yolanda Meije, Adriana Manzur, José María Aguado, Celia Cardozo, Jordi Carratalà, María José Blanco-Vidal, José Miguel Montejo, Mireia Puig-Asensio, Antonio Vena, Carlota Gudiol, Guillermo Cuervo, Javier Pemán
Rok vydání: 2017
Předmět:
Zdroj: CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
r-IIS La Fe. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
instname
ISSN: 1058-4838
Popis: Background. Whether echinocandins could be used to treat candidemia of a urinary tract source (CUTS) is unknown. We aimed to provide current epidemiological information of CUTS and to compare echinocandin to fluconazole treatment on CUTS outcomes. Methods. A multicenter study of adult patients with candidemia was conducted in 9 hospitals. CUTS was defined as a candidemia with concomitant candiduria by the same organism associated with significant urological comorbidity. The primary outcome assessed was clinical failure (defined by 7-day mortality or persistent candidemia) in patients treated with either an echinocandin or fluconazole. A propensity score was calculated and then entered into a regression model. Results. Of 2176 episodes of candidemia, 128 were CUTS (5.88%). Most CUTS cases were caused by Candida albicans (52.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (25.6%) and Candida tropicalis (16.3%). Clinical failure occurred in 7 patients (20%) treated with an echinocandin and in 15 (17.1%) treated with fluconazole (P=.730). Acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-8.91; P=.047) was the only independent factor associated with clinical failure, whereas early urinary tract drainage procedures (surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic) were identified as protective (AOR, 0.08; 95% CI,.02-.31; P
Databáze: OpenAIRE