Prospective audit of aminoglycoside usage in a general hospital with assessments of clinical processes and adverse clinical outcomes
Autor: | Shu C. Li, Lisa L. Ioannides‐Demos, W. John Spicer, Con Berbatis, Denis W. Spelman, Nicholas Tong, Allan J. McLean, John Shaw, Felix Bochner, Peter M. Brooks, John J. McNeil, Robert F.W. Moulds, Peter J. Ravenscroft, Anthony J. Smith |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 1989 |
Předmět: |
Drug
medicine.medical_specialty Time Factors Victoria medicine.drug_class media_common.quotation_subject Cephalosporin Microbial Sensitivity Tests Hospitals General Nephrotoxicity Internal medicine Gram-Negative Bacteria Tobramycin Humans Medicine Prospective Studies Practice Patterns Physicians' Medical prescription Intensive care medicine Prospective cohort study media_common Medical Audit business.industry Aminoglycoside Bacterial Infections General Medicine Aminoglycosides Outcome and Process Assessment Health Care Creatinine Kidney Diseases Gentamicin Gentamicins business medicine.drug |
Zdroj: | Medical Journal of Australia. 151:224-232 |
ISSN: | 1326-5377 0025-729X |
DOI: | 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1989.tb115996.x |
Popis: | A comprehensive, multiphasic review of gentamicin and tobramycin utilization was undertaken with audits of the microbiological sensitivity of Gram-negative pathogens; indications for the prescription of aminoglycoside agents; the utilization of assay services; the adequacy of clinical drug delivery by measures of serum antibiotic levels; and the assessment of adverse outcomes by markers of nephrotoxicity. The great majority of clinical isolates of target organisms (n = 4208) was more sensitive to gentamicin (96%) and to tobramycin (99%) than to all alternative agents, including first- and third-generation cephalosporin agents. A review of the indications for the prescription of aminoglycoside agents by clinical criteria showed that in 85.6% of 278 documented cases, the choice of agent was appropriate by clinical and microbiological criteria. In a substantial (77.6%) proportion of the 511 patients who were receiving therapeutic courses of an aminoglycoside agent, serum drug assays had been performed. Assay data could not be interpreted adequately in 52.6% of 3079 assayed cases as a result of inadequate data on administration regimens (39.7%) or sampling regimens (12.9%). Where sampling was documented adequately, there was extreme variation (zero to five hours) in post-dose sampling. In only 33.2% of cases could it be concluded unambiguously that the patients were receiving safer, adequate therapy for clinically significant infections, 5.6% of patients were receiving potentially toxic doses, and 8.6% of patients showed suboptimal concentration profiles. The majority of potentially toxic levels were associated with adverse effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |