Effectiveness of glatiramer acetate compared to other multiple sclerosis therapies

Autor: Macarena Rus, Antonio García-Ruiz, Nuria García-Agua Soler, Guillermo Izquierdo
Přispěvatelé: [Izquierdo,G, Rus,M] Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain. [García-Agua Soler,N, García-Ruiz,AJ] Health Economics and Rational Drug Use, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain. [García-Ruiz,AJ] Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain., This work was funded by Teva Pharma S.L.U. Partial financial support was also provided by Asociacion Neuroinvest.
Jazyk: angličtina
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Male
Diseases::Pathological Conditions
Signs and Symptoms::Pathologic Processes::Disease Attributes::Recurrence [Medical Subject Headings]

Calidad de vida
Effectiveness
Clinical practice
Organisms::Eukaryota::Animals::Chordata::Vertebrates::Mammals::Primates::Haplorhini::Catarrhini::Hominidae::Humans [Medical Subject Headings]
Behavioral Neuroscience
Disability Evaluation
Glatiramer acetate
Clinical endpoint
Secondary Prevention
Medicine
Analytical
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Investigative Techniques::Epidemiologic Methods::Statistics as Topic::Probability::Odds Ratio [Medical Subject Headings]

Original Research
Diseases::Pathological Conditions
Signs and Symptoms::Pathologic Processes::Disease Attributes::Chronic Disease [Medical Subject Headings]

treatment
Hazard ratio
Middle Aged
Antirheumatic Agents
Cohort
Disease Progression
Female
medicine.drug
Cohort study
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Multiple Sclerosis
Recurrencia
effectiveness
Oportunidad relativa
Diseases::Nervous System Diseases::Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System::Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases
CNS::Multiple Sclerosis [Medical Subject Headings]

Multiple sclerosis
Disciplines and Occupations::Social Sciences::Quality of Life [Medical Subject Headings]
Internal medicine
Humans
Retrospective Studies
therapy
Expanded Disability Status Scale
Diseases::Pathological Conditions
Signs and Symptoms::Pathologic Processes::Disease Attributes::Disease Progression [Medical Subject Headings]

business.industry
Enfermedad crónica
Retrospective cohort study
Odds ratio
Glatiramer Acetate
Patient Outcome Assessment
Treatment
Spain
Analytical
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment::Investigative Techniques::Epidemiologic Methods::Epidemiologic Study Characteristics as Topic::Epidemiologic Studies::Cohort Studies [Medical Subject Headings]

Physical therapy
Quality of Life
Therapy
business
Zdroj: Brain and Behavior
Popis: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of glatiramer acetate (GA) compared to other multiple sclerosis (MS) therapies in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS Observational cohort study carried out in MS patients treated with GA (GA cohort) or other MS therapies -switched from GA- (non-GA cohort). Study data were obtained through review of our MS patient database. The primary endpoint was the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores reached at the end of treatment/last check-up. RESULTS A total of 180 patients were included: GA cohort n = 120, non-GA cohort n = 60. Patients in the GA cohort showed better EDSS scores at the end of treatment/last check-up (mean ± SD, 2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.9 ± 2.2; P = 0.001) and were 1.65 times more likely to show better EDSS scores compared to the non-GA cohort (odds ratio, 0.606; 95%CI, 0.436-0.843; P = 0.003). Patients in the GA cohort showed longer mean time to reach EDSS scores of 6 (209.1 [95%CI, 187.6-230.6] vs. 164.3 [95% CI, 137.0-191.6] months; P = 0.004) and slower disability progression (hazard ratio, 0.415 [95%CI, 0.286-0.603]; P < 0.001). The annualized relapse rate was lower in the GA cohort (mean ± SD, 0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.5; P = 0.001) and patients' quality of life was improved in this study cohort compared to the non-GA cohort (mean ± SD, 0.7 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS GA may slow down the progression of EDSS scores to a greater extent than other MS therapies, as well as achieving a greater reduction in relapses and a greater improvement in patients' quality of life. Switching from GA to other MS therapies has not proved to entail a better response to treatment. Yes
Databáze: OpenAIRE