The influence and added value of a Standardized Assessment and Reporting System for functioning outcomes upon national rehabilitation quality reports
Autor: | Birgit Prodinger, Cristina Ehrmann, Alan Tennant, Gerold Stucki, Roxanne Maritz |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
psychometrics
Adult Male Gerontology 030506 rehabilitation Activities of daily living medicine.medical_treatment Psychological intervention Standardized test international classification of functioning disability and health rehabilitation Disability Evaluation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine quality of health care International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health Activities of Daily Living Added value medicine Humans AcademicSubjects/MED00860 Disabled Persons Musculoskeletal Diseases Aged public reporting of healthcare data outcome assessment (health care) Aged 80 and over Rehabilitation business.industry Health Policy Public Health Environmental and Occupational Health General Medicine Middle Aged Treatment Outcome Scale (social sciences) Female Metric (unit) Nervous System Diseases 0305 other medical science business Psychology Switzerland 030217 neurology & neurosurgery Research Article |
Zdroj: | International Journal for Quality in Health Care |
ISSN: | 1464-3677 1353-4505 |
DOI: | 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa058 |
Popis: | ObjectiveTo demonstrate the influence and added value of a Standardized Assessment and Reporting System (StARS) upon the reporting of functioning outcomes for national rehabilitation quality reports. A StARS builds upon an ICF-based (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) and interval-scaled common metric.DesignComparison of current ordinal-scaled Swiss national rehabilitation outcome reports including an expert-consensus-based transformation scale with StARS-based reports through descriptive statistical methods and content exploration of further development areas of the reports with relevant ICF Core Sets.SettingSwiss national public rehabilitation outcome quality reports on the clinic level.ParticipantsA total of 29 Swiss rehabilitation clinics provided their quality report datasets including 18 047 patients.InterventionsNeurological or musculoskeletal rehabilitation.Main outcome measuresFunctional Independence Measure™ or Extended Barthel Index.ResultsOutcomes reported with a StARS tended to be smaller but more precise than in the current ordinal-scaled reports, indicating an overestimation of achieved outcomes in the latter. The comparison of the common metric’s content with ICF Core Sets suggests to include ‘energy and drive functions’ or ‘maintaining a basic body position’ to enhance the content of functioning as an indicator.ConclusionsA StARS supports the comparison of outcomes assessed with different measures on the same interval-scaled ICF-based common metric. Careful consideration is needed whether an ordinal-scaled or interval-scaled reporting system is applied as the magnitude and precision of reported outcomes is influenced. The StARS’ ICF basis brings an added value by informing further development of functioning as a relevant indicator for national outcome quality reports in rehabilitation. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |