580 Glutamine blockade in combination with immune checkpoint blockade remodels the myeloid landscape in mouse models of soft tissue sarcomas
Autor: | Nicolas J. Llosa, Aditya Suru, Ada Tam, John Mc Mahon Gross, Marwa Islam |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Pharmacology
Cancer Research Myeloid business.industry Immunology Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Soft tissue Immune checkpoint Blockade Glutamine medicine.anatomical_structure Oncology Cancer research medicine Molecular Medicine Immunology and Allergy business RC254-282 |
Zdroj: | Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, Vol 9, Iss Suppl 2 (2021) |
ISSN: | 2051-1426 |
DOI: | 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.580 |
Popis: | BackgroundImmunotherapy holds great potential to treat cancers such as sarcomas for which the clinical outcomes using conventional therapies haven’t changed much in decades. A major impediment for immune mediated tumor killing in sarcomas is a strong presence of immunosuppressive cell types such as Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC) dominating the Tumor Immune Micro-Environment (TIME) and a dearth of effector cell types such as T Cells [1]. Cellular metabolism has emerged as a novel immune-checkpoint to modulate the immune responses by targeting various metabolic pathways. Glutamine is a key metabolite participating in the TCA cycle and is implicated in sarcoma-genesis [2] and its blockade has shown to skew immune cell function and phenotype [3]. We used JHU083, a novel prodrug of a glutamine antagonist (6-Diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine) to rid the TME of glutamine and interrogate its downstream effects on the TIME.MethodsWe employed a transplantable mouse model of soft tissue sarcomas [4]: Cells derived from primary tumors from LSL-KrasG12D/+ p53flox/flox mice (KP Cells). Wild-type C57BL/6J mice were subcutaneously injected with 200,000 KP cells. They were treated with JHU083 (1mg/kg on days 7–11 and 0.3mg/kg till end) and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody (100ug on days 7, 9, 11 and 13) or vehicle control and isotype control. On Day 22, the mice were sacrificed, and the tumors were harvested and interrogated using flow cytometry and Immuno-histochemistry (IHC) to reveal the effects of different treatment groups on the immune landscape.ResultsThe combination treated group had significantly less tumor burden at the end of Day 21 than the control group (Figure 1). Although the myeloid cells outnumbered the lymphocytes across both the groups, the percentage of G-MDSCs reduced significantly in the combination treated group (17% in the combination, vs 29% in the control, p=0.058, Figure 2). The density of T cells and B cells infiltrating the tumors was also higher for the combination treated group than other groups as measured by IHC (Figure 3).Abstract 580 Figure 1The mice treated with a combination of JHU083 and anti-PD1 therapy had significantly less tumor burden than the mice treated with vehicle control and isotype controlAbstract 580 Figure 2Combination of JHU083 and anti-PD1 therapy led to a decrease in the number of G-MDSCs (defined as CD11b+Lineage-Ly6ClowLy6G+MHC2-) as a proportion of the myeloid cells (CD11b+Lineage-)Abstract 580 Figure 3The photomicrographs of the single chromogenic IHC stains for CD4, CD8, CD45R, F4/80 show that the combination treated tumors had higher density of the CD8 T Cells and the B Cells as measured by ImmunohistochemistryConclusionsOur data suggests that blocking glutamine with anti-PD1 therapy leads to a change in the proportion of myeloid cells in the TIME. The combination treatment increased the influx of T and B cells while reducing the density of the immunosuppressive G-MDSCs. For cancers with immune excluded/desert phenotypes this therapy has the potential to make the tumors amenable to immunotherapy leading to better clinical outcomes. Further transcriptomic and metabolomic studies will reveal the mechanistic pathways by which glutamine blockade is able to remodel the myeloid landscape.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Prof. Jonathan Powell and his lab for providing us with the JHU083 drug and valuable inputs. The Immunohistochemistry work was performed by the Oncology Tissue Services Core at the Johns Hopkins University. We would also like to thank the BKI Flow cytometry core for providing support for the flow cytometry experiments.ReferencesL Chen et al, The Immunosuppressive Niche of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas is Sustained by Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Characterized by Intratumoral Tertiary Lymphoid Structures. Clinical Cancer Research. 2020; 26: 4018–4030.Lee, P., Malik, D., Perkons, N. et al. Targeting glutamine metabolism slows soft tissue sarcoma growth. Nat Commun 11, 498 (2020).Min-Hee Oh et al, Targeting glutamine metabolism enhances tumor-specific immunity by modulating suppressive myeloid cells, J Clin Invest. 2020;130(7):3865–3884.D Kirsch et al, A spatially and temporally restricted mouse model of soft tissue sarcoma. Nat Med. 2007 Aug;13(8):992–7Ethics ApprovalAll animal procedures performed were approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care Committee. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |