Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability in TLIF, PLIF, and XLIF Applications
Autor: | Alexander W. L. Turner, Justin V. Bundy, Edward Nomoto, Alexandre Rasouli, Guy R. Fogel |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Orthodontics
musculoskeletal diseases 030222 orthopedics business.industry Original Articles screw fixation musculoskeletal system Screw fixation 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Lumbar interbody fusion lumbar interbody fusion Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Surgery Neurology (clinical) Pedicle screw fixation cortical screw Cadaveric spasm business screw trajectory 030217 neurology & neurosurgery |
Zdroj: | Global Spine Journal |
ISSN: | 2192-5682 |
Popis: | Study Design:Cadaveric biomechanical study.Objectives:Medial-to-lateral trajectory cortical screws are of clinical interest due to the ability to place them through a less disruptive, medialized exposure compared with conventional pedicle screws. In this study, cortical and pedicle screw trajectory stability was investigated in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) constructs.Methods:Eight lumbar spinal units were used for each interbody/screw trajectory combination. The following constructs were tested: TLIF + unilateral facetectomy (UF) + bilateral pedicle screws (BPS), TLIF + UF + bilateral cortical screws (BCS), PLIF + medial facetectomy (MF) + BPS, PLIF + bilateral facetectomy (BF) + BPS, PLIF + MF + BCS, PLIF + BF + BCS, XLIF + BPS, XLIF + BCS, and XLIF + bilateral laminotomy + BCS. Range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation was assessed using pure moments.Results:All instrumented constructs were significantly more rigid than intact ( P < .05) in all test directions except TLIF + UF + BCS, PLIF + MF + BCS, and PLIF + BF + BCS in axial rotation. In general, XLIF and PLIF + MF constructs were more rigid (lowest ROM) than TLIF + UF and PLIF + BF constructs. In the presence of substantial iatrogenic destabilization (TLIF + UF and PLIF + BF), cortical screw constructs tended to be less rigid (higher ROM) than the same pedicle screw constructs in lateral bending and axial rotation; however, no statistically significant differences were found when comparing pedicle and cortical fixation for the same interbody procedures.Conclusions:Both cortical and pedicle trajectory screw fixation provided stability to the 1-level interbody constructs. Constructs with the least iatrogenic destabilization were most rigid. The more destabilized constructs showed less lateral bending and axial rotation rigidity with cortical screws compared with pedicle screws. Further investigation is warranted to understand the clinical implications of differences between constructs. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |