Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic differences

Autor: Shandra Bipat, Paul Fockens, Frans M. Vos, Evelien Dekker, Jaap Stoker, Roel Truyen, Jasper Florie, Johannes B. Reitsma, E.M.H. Mathus-Vliegen, Ayso H. de Vries, Roel van der Kraan, Marjolein H. Liedenbaum, Aeilko H. Zwinderman
Přispěvatelé: Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, APH - Amsterdam Public Health, Epidemiology and Data Science, ANS - Amsterdam Neuroscience, Faculteit der Geneeskunde
Jazyk: angličtina
Předmět:
Zdroj: European radiology, 20(6), 1404-1413. Springer Verlag
European Radiology, 20(6), 1404-1413. Springer Verlag
European Radiology
ISSN: 0938-7994
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1683-0
Popis: Objective To assess the variability and systematic differences in polyp measurements on optical colonoscopy and CT colonography. Materials Gastroenterologists measured 51 polyps by visual estimation, forceps comparison and linear probe. CT colonography observers randomly assessed polyp size two-dimensionally (abdominal and intermediate window) and three-dimensionally (manually and semi-automatically). Linear mixed models were used to assess the variability and systematic differences between CT colonography and optical colonoscopy techniques. Results The variability of forceps and linear probe measurements was comparable and both showed less variability than measurement by visual assessment. Measurements by linear probe were 0.7 mm smaller than measurements by visual assessment or by forceps. The variability of all CT colonography techniques was lower than for measurements by forceps or visual assessment and sometimes lower (only 2D intermediate window and manual 3D) compared with measurements by linear probe. All CT colonography measurements judged polyps to be larger than optical colonoscopy, with differences ranging from 0.7 to 2.3 mm. Conclusion A linear probe does not reduce the measurement variability of endoscopists compared with the forceps. Measurement differences between observers on CT colonography were usually smaller than at optical colonoscopy. Polyps appeared larger when using various CT colonography techniques than when measured during optical colonoscopy.
Databáze: OpenAIRE