Comparison of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy
Autor: | Mahbuba Shirin, Mst Nazmun Nahar, Ahmed R, F Sultana, M.A. Quddus ., A Khatun, A Sattar |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2015 |
Předmět: |
Pregnancy
medicine.medical_specialty Ectopic pregnancy Transvaginal ultrasonography business.industry General Medicine Gold standard (test) medicine.disease Predictive value Ultrasonography Prenatal Diagnostic modalities Endosonography Pregnancy Ectopic Cross-Sectional Studies Predictive Value of Tests Predictive value of tests medicine Humans Female Radiology business Transabdominal ultrasonography |
Zdroj: | Bangladesh Medical Research Council bulletin. 39(3) |
ISSN: | 0377-9238 |
Popis: | This cross sectional study was carried out in the department of Radiology and Imaging, Dhaka Medical College Hospital from July 2008 to June 2010 to compare the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography and transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of clinically suspected cases of ectopic pregnancy. Initially 60 patients with clinical suspicion of ectopic pregnancy were included in this study after analyzing selection criteria 30 patients underwent both transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography. Histopathological diagnosis was considered gold standard against which accuracies of two diagnostic modalities were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality in evaluation of suspected ectopic pregnancy were 73.1%, 75%, 95%, 30% and 73.3% respectively where as transvaginal ultrasonography was found to have 92.3% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 96% positive predictive value, 60% negative predictive value and 90% accuracy. Transvaginal ultrasonography was superior to transabdominal ultrasonography in the evaluation of suspected ectopic pregnancies .so, transvaginal ultrasonography is important for early and accurate diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v39i3.20309 Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2013; 39: 104-108 |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |