The use of a multidisciplinary morbidity and mortality conference to incorporate ACGME general competencies
| Autor: | Matthew P. Landman, Rondi M. Kauffmann, Sandra H. Bledsoe, Gerald B. Hickson, R. Daniel Beauchamp, Roger R. Dmochowski, Julia Shelton, Jeffery B. Dattilo |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2011 |
| Předmět: |
Male
Quality management Graduate medical education MEDLINE Article Education Accreditation Patient safety Nursing Multidisciplinary approach Medicine Humans Mortality Retrospective Studies Medical education business.industry Internship and Residency Resident education Retrospective cohort study Congresses as Topic Quality Improvement United States Education Medical Graduate General Surgery Surgery Interdisciplinary Communication Clinical Competence Morbidity business |
| Zdroj: | Journal of surgical education. 68(4) |
| ISSN: | 1878-7452 |
| Popis: | The Surgical Morbidity and Mortality conference has long been used as an opportunity for both process improvement and resident education. With recent heightened focus on creating environments of safety and on meeting the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) General Competencies, novel approaches are required. With the understanding that the provision of medical care is an inherently multidisciplinary enterprise, we advocate the creation and use of a Multidisciplinary Morbidity and Mortality conference (MMM) as a means to establish this culture of safety while teaching the ACGME General Competencies to surgery residents.A quarterly MMM conference was implemented to foster communication between disciplines, provide a forum for quality improvement, and enhance patient care. All stakeholders in the perioperative enterprise attend, including the departments of surgery, anesthesia, radiology, pharmacy, nursing, environmental services, risk management, and patient services. Cases that expose system issues with potential to harm patients are discussed in an open, nonconfrontational forum. Solutions are presented and initiatives developed to improve patient outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the topics presented since the conference's inception, grouping them into 1 of 7 categories. We then evaluated the completion of the improvement initiatives developed after discussion at the conference.Over a 21-month period, 11 cases were discussed with 23 "actionable" initiatives for quality improvement. Cases were grouped by category; procedures (36.5%), process (36.5%), patient-related (9%), communication (9%), medication (9%), device (0%), and ethics (0%). All cases discussed addressed at least 4 of the 6 ACGME General Competencies.Like the practice of medicine, the occurrence of adverse outcomes is frequently multidisciplinary. An MMM conference is useful in its potential to meet ACGME General Competencies, engender a culture of patient safety, and rapidly achieve quality improvement and systems health care delivery initiatives in a large academic medical center. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect