Wireless non-invasive continuous respiratory monitoring with FMCW radar: a clinical validation study

Autor: A. T. Rheineck Leyssius, K. van Loon, Martine J.M. Breteler, Linda M. Peelen, B. van Zaane, S. Kossen, Cor J. Kalkman, L. van Wolfwinkel
Rok vydání: 2015
Předmět:
Adult
Male
Respiratory rate
Monitoring
medicine.medical_treatment
Movement
Health Informatics
Respiratory monitoring
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
01 natural sciences
law.invention
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
law
medicine
Journal Article
Humans
Validation Studies
Postoperative Period
Radar
Respiratory system
Monitoring
Physiologic

Original Research
Mechanical ventilation
Capnography
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Respiration
010401 analytical chemistry
Reproducibility of Results
Remote
030208 emergency & critical care medicine
Signal Processing
Computer-Assisted

Middle Aged
Respiration
Artificial

0104 chemical sciences
Continuous-wave radar
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Cross-Sectional Studies
Anesthesia
Breathing
Female
business
Artifacts
Respiratory Insufficiency
Wireless Technology
Algorithms
Zdroj: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 30(6), 797–805. Springer Netherlands
ISSN: 1573-2614
1387-1307
Popis: Altered respiratory rate is one of the first symptoms of medical conditions that require timely intervention, e.g., sepsis or opioid-induced respiratory depression. To facilitate continuous respiratory rate monitoring on general hospital wards a contactless, non-invasive, prototype monitor was developed using frequency modulated continuous wave radar. We aimed to study whether radar can reliably measure respiratory rate in postoperative patients. In a diagnostic cross-sectional study patients were monitored with the radar and the reference monitor (pneumotachograph during mechanical ventilation and capnography during spontaneous breathing). Eight patients were included; yielding 796 min of observation time during mechanical ventilation and 521 min during spontaneous breathing. After elimination of movement artifacts the bias and 95 % limits of agreement for mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing were −0.12 (−1.76 to 1.51) and −0.59 (−5.82 to 4.63) breaths per minute respectively. The radar was able to accurately measure respiratory rate in mechanically ventilated patients, but the accuracy decreased during spontaneous breathing. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10877-015-9777-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Databáze: OpenAIRE